|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.2800" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=640074922-18052000>I
don't know about Kevin's but Steve's are like that.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of </B>Dave V<BR><B>Sent:</B> 18 May 2000 19:43<BR><B>To:</B>
metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Please understand that Mr. Maas
is Dutch. They are all like that. <BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<P><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>>They are all like
that<BR><BR>Isn't that like saying "ALL people named Kevin are fat, lazy
bums who have never worked a day in their life"<BR>----------<BR>> From:
<FONT color=#0000ff><U>Kevin243@xxxxxxx</U><FONT color=#000000><BR>> To:
<FONT color=#0000ff><U>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</U><FONT color=#000000><BR>>
Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's<BR>> Date: Thursday,
May 18, 2000 1:28 PM<BR>> <BR>> Gentlemen,<BR>> <BR>> Please
understand that Mr. Maas is Dutch. They are all like that. They
are <BR>> bright, sassy, always giving you crap, and always needling.
<BR>> <BR>> I know, I work with a Dutchman. (His whole
family is like that!!!). <BR>> <BR>> I think we can tolerate each
other on this list. Just ignore what you don't <BR>> agree
with.<BR>> <BR>> Kevin
Campbell<BR><BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu May 18 17:07:38 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26345
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2000 16:44:27 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA29251
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 2000 17:04:44 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA29248
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2000 17:04:41 -0600
Received: from pimout3-int.prodigy.net (pimout3-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.102])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14282
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2000 17:21:46 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from babakid (LAURA030-0944.splitrock.net [63.253.136.182])
by pimout3-int.prodigy.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA44328
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2000 19:04:58 -0400
Message-ID: <002401bfc11d$78de2520$0100a8c0@xxxxxxx>
From: "Brian/Louise Garnant" <babakid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <001901bfc0a8$ca1b78e0$5560a4c1@xxxxx>
Subject: SWEAR? Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 19:04:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Excuse me. I did not hear a swear. Not civil? Perhaps elevated, maybe not
exuberant (sorry Mr. Interest Rate), maybe not quite happy, BUT DID YOU
NOTICE THE PROFIT MARGIN?????
That's talking. Like they say in NYC (or used to) "Money talks". And since
half the reason I read through this stuff every night is to gain insight
into making money, I for one would very much like to hear what Mr. Maas has
to say.
I ain't perfect. You ain't perfect. Mr. Maas ain't perfect.
Yes, civility is to be cherished.
However, much more has been written here, by others. There is nothing that
would warrant censure. AND CERTAINLY MUCH THAT WOULD WARRANT A "GOOD CALL ON
THE NASDAQ." And I would like to add, "how did you see it, and why did you
think (or feel) that strongly about it to publish your anticipation of the
move. You usually don't, so what is it about this time that prompts you."
Thank you, Ton.
Brian Garnant
Montgomery Village, Maryland, USA
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Roberts <Roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> Mr Maas,
>
> Please moderate your language.
>
> It is neither necessary nor grown up to swear. Nor does it strengthen your
> argument.
>
> If you cannot be civil, and communicate quietly, then I for one would be
> pleased if you took yourself to some other place.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Simon Roberts
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 18 May 2000 02:33
> Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
>
>
> >I have received a valid SELL signal on March 17th and a false BUY +
another
> valid SELL
> >(straight after the false BUY) so far on the Nasdaq.
> >Triggered by a by me owned and publicaly published (here on the List)
> propriety-indicator :
> >the Coppock Curve. (So Steve K. and potential other 'hackers' be well
> upfront notified !).
> >
> >That's a single trade : a SELL @ 4817 which is currently @ 3700, and
> straightout nosediving
> >to its first stop @ 2800, and a for the moment alone -shorting- profit of
> 1117 (U$) points.
> >
> >No other trades were signaled. Only this common logical trade.
> >Did I miss out on something -back in my schooldays- mathematical wise ?
> >
> >What the heck then is that crap written below ?
> >Are you + mr dinapples(is he a List-member too?) TRADE-junkies or
something
> ?
> >The hooked-and-therefore-not-ever-to-be-stopped-on-trading-suicidals ?
> >
> >What are you transponing the MSK List into ? A playhouse ? A fancy fair ?
A
> Casino ?
> >
> >I once joined the List for receiving SERIOUS info on Technical Analysis
and
> MSK issues, eg
> >receiving for me unknown technical information, now to not only receive
> "self-aclaimed techniques"
> >on how junks methodoligy spil their dope...........but also to receive
> advertisement mails on
> >hola-hoop methodologies.
> >
> >I don't need this list for any business practises, eg I have made my own
> fortune well enough from
> >serious analysis (has made me fortunate enough), neither for that reason
> too do I have to go
> >into a business practise or do I have to advertise myself here.
> >
> >So if the quality of the mails received cannot live up to proper serious
TA
> or MSK issues standards
> >soon, then I am left with seriously reconciddering............
> >The crap that flies around lately, is not only filling precious
diskspace,
> but also a TRUE WASTE
> >OF MY TIME................and that of many others.
> >
> >The latest very bearish patterns on the Nasdaq are the Rising Wedge, the
> large Diamond, the H+Ss
> >and the 50 % Fractal Retracement hit, with for now at the most a return
to
> the 33.3% level, and where
> >patterns all are (but a return is not) RSI-confirmed.
> >Thus, for now and more likely, is a continuation down to first the 2800
> stop(previous breakout support)
> >and later this year the lower breakout level 2100 for Target. See also my
> previous Nasdaq-mail.
> >Without a BUY signal, that's hell of a way down, but also very
acceptable,
> eg and common sense and
> >well (the downtrade) worth it.
> >
> >As for the fib+napoly, take your stuff and go back to the shit yards
where
> it belongs.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ton Maas
> >ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> >Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Neal Hughes"
> >To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: woensdag 17 mei 2000 7:11
> >Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hello Metastock traders.. This is in response to some requests today
for
> >> an explanation of DiNapoli trading techniques..
> >>
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> snip snip
>
>
|