|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> ~What, to you sir, constitutes SERIOUS Technical Analysis?
Researching the markets singly or combined using the qualified and throughout
the times over and over again self-a-prooved TA methods, tools and analogies,
that are based on prooven fundamentaly solid grounds.
> Are you so steeped in the old that you adamantly refuse to accept anything new?~~
I think from you hanging around too much in the very basement of the markets(see further below),
have therefore missed the many refreshing mailings that were posted by me+a very few others
over the past years, eg posts on using new approaches and tools for TA , the markets and
in the MSK program.
Like anyone that's using common sense and most of all paid attention, than you would have
also kept a history of my mailings, eg saved them over the past years. Then you too would have
had now, like many-many others have done, the benifit of also being enriched with the many by me
or by others written indicators and write ups on old and new technical issues and technical analysis
of the markets. And would not have asked these dumb questions.
One of my largest and most recent refreshments issue posted is the OLE connectivety
manual(faq's), a quick-manual to now give all MSK users access to and therefore the ability
to fully use and exploit the figures' crunching Excel program, in combination with MSK use.
Part of analysis is research, and thus not only for the likes of you that are gifted with being
short of and lacked in memory, create an Analysis folder in your mail program, start saving the
valuable mailings and also over time start researching.
It would have stopped you from asking these truely dumb blonds questions.
> ~~Congratulations to you, sir, on your past successes.
Coincidence ?
I continuesly keep receiving these type of com(pli)ments for the past 10+ years...........
> You are aware, of course, that markets and methodologies are in a constant state of flux and
> change because of new people and ideas that come into the trading arena.~~
See the research and how-to-find-(out about any track records)-information above.
Markets are constantly on the move, and are way much faster than proper new TA approaches.
Yes proper, since that most 'new' TA approaches are only copied old ones, now with only
new names given to them, eg "coated".
The ones that are indeed new, of which many still have to proove themselves, are rarely posted
on the MSK list, unfortunatly if also posted, then by the same small group(4-5 members) of
constant contributers.
Your 1 or 2 contributions over the past 2+ years, didn't help this case much either (at all) ofcourse,
eg them being mere questions on day Trading Tactics, an issue that's more personal, needs
so many other criteria's and therefore too not ever to be mixed with TA.
> ~~Some of us are very sorry that the quality of our posts are not acceptable to your standards.
So you should be.
> Certainly a man of your standards and demands cannot afford to waste your valuable time.
True. And a last ever reply to you(and the likes) it therefore is.
> It is with much regret
> that you will consider leaving this list if we do not all agree to accept
> your posts as absolute gospel concerning whatever subject is at hand.
(In) Aiming for the perfection..........(read: best gaining approaches/lessest risks).
Your always free/at liberty to counter attack them (correction: You+the likes are expelled).
That is what discussioning, oppose to chatting (what many of the likes of you here like to do),
is all about.
Let the facts speak. For the values needed to be most successfull in the markets, eg to
reach the highest levels in gains possible, with the best reduced but-always-everywhere-present-
risks in viewsight and in controll.
And be a true sport like Neal : not personaly feeling to be the countered subject, but subject
countered being the suggested trading strategy or the analysis (values).
> I am certain that the Equis Listmaster would regrettably honor your request to
> leave us.
I am certain that you are a better Belly-speaker(ventriloqist)?
> Admittedly, I do confess to a financial gain if you do so decide
> to follow through with your threat to depart this list: I would save about
> $11 every three months on the purchase of keyboards....that is how long
> they last before the Delete button wears out due to your voluminous
> posts.~~
Again if you do your research right than what's, and aside if this stupid remark
is ever at all applicable(see your research Analysis folder), a $11 loss versus
a $1100 profit?
Are you that stupid, and using your basement markets(see below) margins approach ?
> ~~Mr. Maas, if you ever trade currencies and/or bonds, you will find that
> fib levels are an integral part of every trader's and institution's
> analysis tools. If you do not understand them, consider learning of their
> value rather than condemnation simply because their use is beyond your
> scope.~~
Technical research forbits me to enter the basement of the markets.
Plain put : not considdered - out of the question - waste of precious time.
The Return On Investment(ROI) ratio versus the Risk/Reward(RR) ratio tremendously
and dramatically overseeds any acceptable values, wether using the physicals(underlay)
or the higher leveled spin-off synthatics(futures,options).
Plain put : Risks are too high than there are the low gains to be made.
For institutes(covering positions) and dumb blonds only.
> Bon Voyage, Mr. Maas
On my TA travels, thank you. Aurivoir, to you too, on your psycho travels !!!
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: donderdag 18 mei 2000 15:34
Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
--------crap--------------
|