|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3616.1301"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Philip,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The Zig Zag indicator can indeed be used for
predictive purposes. Here is one way I use it. There are a multitude
of possibilities. I first took a 2% Zig-Zag of the S&P 500 futures
prices. I then took the ratio of the distance traversed in price from the
most current completed Peak-to-Valley Zig-Zag to the previous Peak-to-Valley
Zig-Zag. The current <U><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>completed
</FONT></U>Peak-to-Valley can only be determined once the 1) following 2%
Valley-to-Peak has completed and 2) the new Peak-to-Trough is underway and is
approaching 2% retracement. Notice the symmetry in the market when these values
are plotted in a chart (see 2%_ZigZag.gif at <A
href="http://www.mindspring.com/~blee7/";>www.mindspring.com/~blee7/</A> ).
Actually the values plotted are the squared values of the ratios indicating
extreme symmetry in the market. I then used neural networks to predict if
the following ratio of Peak-to-Valley is less than or greater than the most
recent known Peak-to-Valley ratio (already completed as described above).
My nets were able to predict the change in the value of ratio with over 92%
accuracy. Not rocket science or a trading system but a nice-to-know value.
-
Brian
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jun 12 18:17:18 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18090
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 18:35:06 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA22193
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 18:27:00 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA22186
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 18:26:55 -0600
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA00593
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 18:45:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from escom ([195.121.216.36]) by smtp02.wxs.nl
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with SMTP id AAF5D6E
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 02:28:21 +0200
Message-ID: <01a901bfd1aa$15d6afe0$71dc79c3@xxxxx>
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <000101bfd188$f8f311a0$5f00a8c0@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "Born to laugh at tornadoes"
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 02:30:50 +0200
Organization: Ms-IRB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.3825.400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.3825.400
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Sorry Andreas, but I.R.'s work IS also technical analysis and was spot on and this was
also the 3td time around now in a very short period that your hero gets unmasked in
professional TA-systems and as for being a clowneske ego-tripping little kid, not bloody
knowing what he's doing or what he's saying or what he is sending. Pure fantasy.
Sience Fiction(SF)
--------------------
-On ones systems posted here: a master-blaster of useless disposable information.
-On ones tactics in the market : a 1 out of 10 for making the effort.
-On one being a Professional attendee: niks,nada,nil.
Whatever your hero's work is, is only known well now to the ones that went down with him
on these several in the past posted capitol blunders approaches, eg that's what one gets
if one does not thouroughly and well upfront test ones systems or duplicated stolen indicators.
Just the latest one "recommomdation" posted would have had user file for bancruptcy
well before Oct.1999, and well before a very profitable market phase started !!
As well when one thinks that he/she already knows it all from only hitting 2 or 3 very lucky
strikes, strikes made in market phases where a dog barking or a blind horse could have
been very succesfull, when also jumping over the clouds in the sky. Thus Sience Fiction(SF).
(June 24 - is a SF-class day too. Perhaps that Walt Disney is interested).
Your hero being into cheap copying shit, prehistoric anecdotes(fib), inexperienced,
irresponsable for not properly testing, continuesly bragging, a rookie in the Equity arena
and nowhere knowledgable in TA, that explains enough.
No public warnings are required either, as is been suggested by many others:
for the above just omit.
And in general:
The List too after all is a brought minded discussioning of MSK or Investing related subjects
by and between its members, not a List for regularly send public financial market
recommendations.(Thank heavens for that).
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Grau" <agrau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: donderdag 8 juni 2000 22:34
Subject: AW: "Born to laugh at tornadoes"
> > If anyone is interested, you need
> > to send your request to: cct@xxxxxxxxxxxx (with twenty five words or less
> > describing "Why I deserve your indicator and rules and what I'm willing to
> > share in return").
>
> ROTFL - no, even better: ROTFLOL
>
> > I will not answer publicly posted request and I will not
> > send the formula out to "wieners" (you know who you are...so, don't even go
> > there).
>
> Oops - that's me :-(
>
>
>
> Steve,
>
> I always enjoyed your humour. It's great you don't just duck-and-cover
> during the current war-of-words.
>
> R.I. aka rosewood_island somehow reminds me of the infamous "Docteur"
> we had some time ago on this list. I guess we just should think of
> those people as some kind of a flue: With the help of a docteur (sik)
> it takes a week to go away - without, it takes seven days.
>
> Andreas
>
>
|