|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>What I understand it to mean
is, first get a 13 period RSI. then take an 8 bar stochastic of that, then a
three day average of that,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>or to use mangled english it is a slow(3period) 8 bar stoch of
a 13 day rsi. A fast stoch is usually a one period averaging.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Simon</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>LPetersen <<A
href="mailto:Lpetersen1@xxxxxxxx";>Lpetersen1@xxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>MetaStock List <<A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>28 June 2000 15:59<BR><B>Subject: </B>Stochastic RSI
<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>Hello <BR>I repeatedly see "Stoch RSI
13,8,3", used with three reference numbers (13,8,3). <BR>Will someone
please explain how to utilize the (13,8,3). Thanks, Larry
<BR>
<P>Tushar Chande apparently uses a value of 14 in his formula (shown below).
<P>( ( RSI ( 14 ) - LLV( RSI (14 ) ,14 ) ) / ( ( HHV( RSI (14 ) ,14 ) ) -
LLV(RSI (14 ),14 ) ) ) <BR><FONT
color=#cc0000>___________________________________________________________________</FONT>
<BR>StochRSI = (RSI - RSIL)/(RSIH -RSIL) <BR>where RSIL and RSIH are the
lowest and highest values of the RSI over a given period.
<BR>___________________________________________________________________
</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jun 28 12:59:33 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04042
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:30:19 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA18653
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:42:24 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA18649
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:42:21 -0600
Received: from mercury.shreve.net (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [208.206.76.23])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA15354
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:03:11 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from default (shv4-194.shreve.net [208.232.62.194])
by mercury.shreve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA30285
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:45:48 -0500
Message-Id: <200006281845.NAA30285@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Moore Research
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:52:07 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
I have not suscribed to Steve's service, but I have reviewed several copies
of his reports and have attended two of his workshops along with Linda
Raschke. For some few years Moore-Raschke were connected: Steve did the
seasonal research and Linda did the trading. Steve was a trader and
seemed to be very through in his market analysis. I am sure he will send
you a copy of one of his reports for you to evaluate his services.
Al Taglavore
----------
> From: SGT099@xxxxxxx
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Moore Research
> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 9:39 AM
>
> Anyone have any experience with or heard anything about the value in
> subscribing to Moore research?
>
> Stan
|