|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Upgrading to a modern mail program will not have you to have to manualy delete
unwanted emails. As well as that I have also explicitly+continiously named the mail's
subject "Re: Diamantiferous"; eg so as to easely enable anyone to set their
Inbox-Asssitant or Message Rules assistant to easely either directly+automaticaly
re-direct(move) or delete(bin) any newly received update mail.
Below too is a list of when the explanation was originaly posted+includes the several
times that its updated version has been posted+reposted as well as further below a
reprint of that original updated explanation.
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
==================================================
Listmails History:
-----------------------
start mail.......................................................................posted on 19990620
-included 1st list of signals + being a reply to Guy Tann
("Re: Faster MS Win 6.5 Explorations Using Cache???")
org post(the explanation)............................................posted on 19990818
-being an additional explanation to the previous list of signals posts
("Re: Diamonds + Fractal Retracements")
update of org post(the explanation)...........................posted on 20000119
-the mailtransformation of "Fractal Retracements" into "Diamantiferous"
("Diamantiferous : calibre + intro")
repost+additional info+table.......................................posted on 20000214
-system at work("update of org post"), including a historical table
("Re: Diamantiferous")-reply to Guy Tann
repost+additional info+table.......................................posted on 20000330
-again the explanation+repost of "update of org post"
("Re: Diamantiferous")-reply to James Palmer
question on lag in signal.............................................posted on 20000415
-short answer+referal to "update of org post"
("Re: Diamantiferous")-reply to James Palmer
repost of "repost+additional info+table"...................posted on 20000520
-jet again the explanation+repost of "update of org post"
("Re: Diamantiferous")-reply to jseed
simple reply to a wrong drawn conclusion................posted on 20000524
-jet again again the explanation of "update of org post"
("Re: Diamantiferous")-reply to jseed
this summing of reptitive mails History.....................posted on 20000701
-including jet again the repost of "update of org post"
("Re: Diamantiferous")-reply to Lance Collins
==================================================
from the 000119 mail:
////////////////////////------------snip------------//////////////////////
Dow Indu - 991029-Positive -unchanged, Positive
Dow Transp - 991228-Positive -000118, Negative***
Dow Utils - 991228-Positive -unchanged, Positive
HangSeng - 000112-Negative -unchanged, Negative
Nikkei 225 - 991228-Positive -unchanged, Positive
SP500 - 000112-Negative -unchanged, Negative
***=adjusted (in todays report)
(for an explanation see the Re: Diamonds + Fractal Retracements
mail dated 990818 and/or see futher below).
Since that mail('s subject) did not have in name anything to do with the system itself, have
therefore changed over the subject name(above). This, after all the signals generated in time
(and up till so far), as well as the indexes that are under surveillance,
are/were all of class-standing:
'diamantiferous class: accuracy & in calibre'.
The next up mail(s) with the latest listed signals' change(s), will then also be -as usual-
"Re: Diamantiferous".
This way I can still store them in my "Diamonds"-folder, and clean out the older ones.
////////////////////////------------snip------------//////////////////////
from the 990818 mail:
LJ (=current code-name)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- The LJ-model-system is a short to intermediate term trend-direction system, that is
based on relational calculations of a future(indicative) pricing force build-up (a sort
momentum) to an already historicaly esthablished/set trend force.
- It produces the Positiveness/Negativeness "flow"-feeling (expressed by a + or - signal)
that is present in a market/index Price-indicator and as such it will not give trend's true
direction, only if its in a "good or bad mood".
- Since I haven't been able (as yet/no time) to replace the "indicative"-part by a "precise"-part
the model will only slightly lag the actual signal (eg usualy by a mere few (1-7) days).
- Therefore and naturaly, it cannot be used as a Trade-signal/system (as yet,see above), eg
as currently it is still an indication (simply put : an "On/Off"-switch) as to where the market/index
stands "calculated the mechanical way" (eg computed) and thus without any human interference
and/or interpretation.
- Historical testing (back as far as 1950 using a variaty of markets, indexes and stocks)
have prooven the amount of whipsaws to be reduced and be kept to a minimum(as possible??)
eg by added use of "build-in restrictions".
- Should this "indicative"-part be replaced by "a precise-part", than the system would well qualify
for it also to be a highly profitable Trade-system, eg signals produced over time were well worth
the time spend on "Testing the system in reality : the day-to-day bourses-life".
This was/is done so by also following it closely on a daily day-to-day basis, over/in the last 3 years
(eg since Winter 1996/97).
-"Rocksolid & glasshard proof": Diamantiferous (=an object, bit/drill/hamer, consisting of one or more
diamond heads, or an object, bit, with a layer of diamant-i-cal-ibre "hardglass coating")
-Thus, it is not a pre-historic 80+billion-yrs-ago died out animal !! either.
==================================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lance Collins" <lcollins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <:>
Sent: zaterdag 1 juli 2000 2:42
Subject: Re: Diamantiferous
> Hi,
> I joined the Metastock list in February and have been hoping you would
> re-post the explanation you refer us to.
> I know your post will be on Dejanews somewhere but I find it so slow as to
> be unusable.
>
> It's now nearly five months that I have been deleting these
> incomprehensible posts.
>
> So, help please.
>
> Regards
> Lance Collins
>
>
>
>
|