[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(Market) bonds



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3018.900" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Looks like a low risk setup to short the bond 
market.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>MIT at 97.5</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Stop at 97.7</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This is NOT a trade recommendation!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Adam</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Jul 07 08:05:39 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10446
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:02:46 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA13397
	for metastock-outgoing; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:07:52 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA13392
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:07:49 -0600
From: Sonnysark@xxxxxxx
Received: from imo-r12.mx.aol.com (imo-r12.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.66])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA21674
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:29:30 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from Sonnysark@xxxxxxx
	by imo-r12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id u.ee.7735ce9 (4245)
	 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:11:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <ee.7735ce9.26973f09@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:11:21 EDT
Subject: Re: Risk of ruin, amount per trade formula?
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

In a message dated 06/27/2000 6:10:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< Mike
 
 We used the Vince book.  Seems to work for us.  We discovered that we were
 running a 100% risk of ruin.  We modified our methodology and went to a 0%
 risk of ruin.  You wouldn't think there would be that big a difference
 between investing 50% of your capital and 33%, but our account balances have
 proven it out. :)
 
 Guy
 
 Paranoia...you only have to be right once to make it all worthwhile!
  >>
Guy where can I learn more about the Vince formula?  Thanks, -Sonny-