|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>From an older mail send back in 1998 (!) :
From: "A.J. Maas"
To: <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: duh Fw: New list software
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 14:34:27 +0100
-----------snip-------------
> Tho, I am getting myself programmed to act according to a Buy/Sell indicator.
> This then can either be the ELWAVE or another indicator which I am currently testing within
> Excel (and as yet cannot be fully implemented in a program like Metatstock).
> I have already been testing this for over a year now and this indicator will be a
> plain On/Off indicator(biwave) with signal crossings of and made by a current positive
> Trend indication and a current negative Trend indication.
>
> A workable duplicate -tho this one is based on LinReg and slightly later signaling- is the
> following biwave "TM - RALLY Meter - LJ2" indicator:
>
> If(((LinearReg(C,14)/Ref(LinearReg(C,14),-9))-1)>
> -0.002,+1,-1)
>
> This is very well to be used with the "TM - RALLY Meter - Osc" indicator(also based on
> LinReg) wich I have mailed to you before:
>
> (LinearReg(C,14)/Ref(LinearReg(C,14),-14))-1
> {as the trigger overlay with a smoothed version, eg a SMA5}
>
> Hope this all answered your mails questions and that you have been able to ride the
> S&P's restanding move upwards with for you the required $ gains,
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
-----------------end-------------
Thus one is the author of unconsented and unauthorised plagiarized indicators and this at its
worst form too..................................e.g. not one single part of my original indicator's formulas
have changed, eg a true Japanese "sixtees styled" real duplicate(pure copy).
And this where the same goes up for the Bollinger's %B Oscillator, which is also a nor by me nor
by Ms-IRB consented and therefore unauthorised plagiarized unlawfully commercialy
exploited indicator.............e.g. again another one being exploited without my permission or consent.
To me there is a line drawn somewhere, where one can freely use one of my many over the years
send indicators, eg 1) if its for private use one is free to do what he wants with it as long as the original
source is respected (in name or for contents), but 2) if it is used for commercial activities then
my private intellectual property and Copyright is at stake, and therefore 3) requires my personal or
Ms-IRB's consent or authorisation to 4) use it or to 5) alter it.
Which neither consents nor authorisations for either of the indicators have been forwarded to our
plagiarismist, nor did I nor Ms-IRB receive any applications for their usage, neither for use of the
Formula's names or for the Formula's contents, in any way or to such any extend.
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: dinsdag 11 juli 2000 16:16
Subject: More teaser email from CCT
> Walter,
>
> I'm certainly not "MetaStock's man"...ask them! I am tanned, rested and
> ready to resume the battle. But, you're right on two accounts: 1. the
> formula and 2. "I'm a dancin' fool". By the way, Walter...all you have to
> do is ask nice and the information will flow in your direction.
>
> *CCT LinRegOsc:
>
> (LinearReg(C,13)/Ref(LinearReg(C,13),-13))-1
>
> Yum, keep the bad press coming,
>
> Steve Karnish
> Cedar Creek Trading
> http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Walter Lake
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 6:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Enough with the Teaser email from CCT
>
>
> > Image a scenario:
> >
> > Metastock needs a salesman for ... ah ... reasons.
> >
> > Steve is ... blah, blah, and blah blah ... in short, he's their man.
> >
> > Now that its a business, a workshopper needs a "package" for the
> > workshop-ees ... maybe an "independent" website ... but definitely a
> fresh
> > and attractively packaged basket of goodies. And of course ... for the
> > really "professional" package, an add-in.
> >
> > Fan-dancing has always been stock in trade for "personalities" in the
> > business. So it's stand to reason that the situation migh evolve into
> "look
> > but don't touch".
> >
> > Steve's a good guy ... lots of friends who will always be happy to jump to
> > his defense. Plus, he's a motor-city guy who eats "bad press" for lunch.
> >
> > So it will be interesting to watch the dance.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Walter
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jim
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 7:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: Enough with the Teaser email from CCT
> >
> >
> > I agree.....i asked him for some of his plays and he told me he had
> already
> > deleted them...3 days later.....huh...
> >
> >
> > At 09:47 AM 7/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
> > "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
> > "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word">
> > Hi:
> > I am missing the point of these types of messages to the group. If you
> > are going to post these types of results from some seminar then why don't
> > you give all everyone on the Metastock list the same systems extended in
> the
> > seminar. Perhaps many members of the group have not had seminars in their
> > area etc and could not avail themselves of your services.
> > If there is a fee for these systems then tell people you are charging
> for
> > this,but don't just throw it up there and let people flounder.
> > I just returned from a very costly but worthwhile seminar where
> > proprietary trading info was given. The trader giving the seminar made us
> > pay for this info and has left it at that.
> > Either tell people results,offer them the info or give them the option
> to
> > pay for the systems or don't bother. Just my opinion on this type of list
> to
> > the group. If I have missed posting of the systems I apologize,If not...
> > Paula
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|