[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Gap risk = critical?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I use the definition that

Risk = probability x consequences

qualitatively in my trading.  Perhaps if I were more experienced or had 
thoroughly tested and proven systems I could use it quantitatively.  With 
that said, I can offer some illustrations of how the concept can be used.

First, a trader that scales into positions might be willing to accept a 
certain amount of "risk" on a given trade.  He takes his initial position 
and the market moves in his direction.  Experience has shown that if the 
market moves in his direction, his probability of success increases and 
thus, his probability of failure decreases.  The trader can then add to his 
position because, although he is increasing his "consequences", his 
probability of failure has decreased and his overall "risk" remains 
unchanged.

Alternately, there might be a trader that uses two chart patterns for 
trading.  His experience has shown that one is 50 percent more likely to be 
profitable than the other.  That trader could take larger positions on the 
pattern that is more likely to suceed without taking more "risk".

Finally, there might be a trader that has a system designed for trending 
markets and another designed for ranging markets.  The trader read somewhere 
on the internet that markets trend 1/3 of the time and range 2/3 of the 
time.  Assuming he is in both systems all of the time, the trader could take 
larger positions in his ranging system without increasing his "risk".

These illustrations are highly idealized and it may not be possible or 
worthwhile to apply the idea that

Risk = probability x consequences

in a quantitative manner.  The point is, however, to make big bets when the 
odds are stacked in your favor and play conservatively or fold when the odds 
are uncertain or against you.  Easier said than done.

Dan


>From: "Gitanshu Buch" <OnWingsOfEagles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: Gap risk = critical?
>Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 19:34:50 -0400
>
> >Risk = probability x consequences
>
>Care to expound using some real world examples?
>Thanks!
>Gitanshu
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com