[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MetaStock 7.02 EOD



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Ron:
Thanks for this information.  It seems that V7.0, V7.01, and V7.02 were not
adequately checked. I know of a software house in Houston, TX who have a
quality verification department that checks all the new software before it
is shipped.  One of the things they do is check every function to see that
it works correctly and fully conforms to its description in the
documentation.

When I open your attachments, the graphic lacks detail.  Is there anything I
can do to make the image sharper?
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Stockstill <stocks@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 10:03 PM
Subject: MetaStock 7.02 EOD


>
> I have done further analysis and found 107 formulas did not convert when
> moving
> from 6.52a to 7.02.
>
> I took the following action:
>
> 1.  I exported the 107 formulas using mswin6.52a organizer.
> 2.  I imported the 107 formulas using mswin 7.02 organizer.
>
> During this process 2 formulas were flagged as referencing formulas that
do
> not exit
> and I believe this is true.  So I did the easy way out and commented the
> formulas
> so that the process would complete.
>
> Now what happened is real interesting.  Many of the formulas now have a
(2)
> appended to the end of the description.  This suggests that MS thinks the
> formulas
> may already exist but were not detected due to a software bug.  I am in
the
> process of removing the (2) appendages on the names and will continue to
> work towards getting MS 7.02 ready to go to work.  The editor does allow
you
> to remove the (2) and does not squawk about the formula already existing.
> Strange!
>
> I have included a bitmap for your enjoyment.
>
> Next, I will tackle getting the templates to work.  The templates are
still
> giving me errors
> that functions are not being calculated correctly.  Of course, these
> functions were not
> even on the template suggesting an indexing into the formulas problem.
Wish
> me luck!
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Ron Stockstill
>
>
>
>