|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-flowed>
Ton,
Time to set the record straight. You presume to have ALL the answers yet I
am continually reading your erroneous assertions! You have asserted that the
Starc Band formula that I posted was taken from a 1990 publication and that
I should have stated that fact. To have done so would have been wrong on my
part since I did not in fact obtain the formulas from that publication! Once
again your assertion is WRONG! You then accuse me of plagiarism. Let's talk
about the countless number of times that you have redesigned postings for
your own benefit. You have accused me of declaring that I have a "super
bragged super BMW super tradekiller super momentum indicator". Those are
your words, not mine. Go back and read the original post again. My inference
was to a BM which I have had and still have to this day. As a matter of fact
I usually have them every day. Yet you are still unable to comprehend the
inference! Wake up Ton you are not as smart as you think you are. You have
also referred to several posts to me as references for an explanation of
your "Diamontiferous" system. You have not explained anything to me other
than your system does not work. Finally, you are intent upon claiming that
the formulas for the DeBry toolbox were stolen from this forum. I challenged
you to post those formulas. Your response was "Nope, not to you, even if
there is one." Then you state, " I will sell you the free toybox for $
35.00 ". You seem confused Ton. Have you decided to sell the "toybox"?
Have you decided to become a vendor of software tools for Metastock? Does
Metastock know of your decision? Are you licensed to do so? Or is this again
another example of your belligerent rantings that are erroneous? I seriously
think you need to reconsider your continual bashing of list members. I
personally find it childish and intolerable. This is an open forum! You may
not like what is stated here but that doesn't give you the right or the
responsibility to "badmouth" anyone on this list. You should also remember
that this forum is open to businesses as well as private concerns. It also
happens to be owned by a business. ACCEPT IT!
J.
>From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: FYI --- DeBry EOD Toolkit
>Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:43:33 +0200
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Ton Maas
>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
>Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "j seed" <jseed_10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: woensdag 19 juli 2000 12:05
>Subject: Re: FYI --- DeBry EOD Toolkit
>
>
> > Ton,
> > America is a capatalist society.
>
>You don't say......
>
> > Things like this happen all the time.
>
>You don't say......
>
> > Not long ago I posted the Starc Bands.
>
> > {This is what I use but any 5 day mov. avg. will work}
> > (Mov(Typical(),5,S))
> >
> > {Starc Upper:}
> > Fml( "STARC BAND" )+ (ATR(15)*1.33)
> >
> > {Starc Lower:}
> > Fml( "STARC BAND" )-(ATR(15)*1.33)
>
>Which thus aren't nowhere near the original Starc Bands. Should you have
>had also written
>in that mail that it is your simple minded interpretation of the original
>1990 publication, and that
>they were also NOT ever based on the original, then I considder you to be
>fair dinkum. A mate
>so to speak. But you continue to produce bull shit, and that towards fellow
>Listers.
>Not a very nice thing to do, and so simply quickly uncoverable.
>
>Here again you made another mess. Or I should say : you tried your
>plagiarism, failed and
>(naturaly honouring your name) AGAIN did NOT SucEED at something.
>But to comfort you in your ungoing traumatic missery, have re-posted the
>authentic, now based
>on the original artical, in another mail to the List today.
>
> > Shortly after that I found them being
> > offered as a monitoring tool on a vendors website. I could have ranted
>about
> > that but was happy that someone found them useful.
>
>One plagiarismist is one too many, two make a crowd.
>
> > You claim that all of the
> > DeBry toolkit can be found in the metastock library. You must remember
>that
> > many on this site have not been here long enough to have an established
> > library. I'm not aware of a centralized library or archive. If there is
> > would you please share that with us.
>
>Nope, not with you, even if there is one.
>
> > Another way to overcome a vendor's
> > exploitation is to offer a free toolkit with the same information.
>
>Being an experiencied copier, I am sure you will do nicely recreating that
>toybox, so
>don't let me stop you.
>
> > Therefore, I am challenging you to do just that. Mind you it MUST be
> > complete, so I have included the DeBry list below. Thanks,
> >
> > J.
>
>I will sell you the free toybox for $ 35.00, and like mentioned in prev
>mails, you miss
>any quality to chalange me.
>
>Now what happened to that super bragged super BMW super tradekiller super
>momentum indicator
>of yours,
>the one that has been on everyone's demands-list for the past year?
>That's still an unfiniushed for-real-life challenge!!
>And yet again another example of one of your in-real-life continious
>blundering failures.
>
>--------------snip-------------
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
</x-flowed>
|