|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-flowed>
Ken,
You've heard a lot of our frustrations. Maybe, it would be helpful to give
us some advice on how we can get overall optimal performance out of this
quirky program. ie. Should we avoid simultaneous running of other programs.
Which will give us better performance IE or Netscape? Are there any
parameters that we can set to really bring our programs alive? Thanks
J.
>From: PD Manager <pdmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: "'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: MetaStock 7.02 EOD
>Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:24:12 -0600
>
>To answer some questions regarding the custom indicator (and other
>formula-based tools):
>
>If you enter a formula that contains a syntax error, the formula is indeed
>saved. The formula with the syntax error is saved, but it is incapable of
>being calculated. If you attempt to calculate such a formula, an
>appropriate error is generated by MetaStock.
>
>We have found that many of our users have numerous formulas that they have
>saved in this fashion. They enter the formula with the syntax error and
>for
>whatever reason they do not fix the error. The formula lies dormant in
>their formula list and is forgotten. When the upgrade their MetaStock and
>a
>formula update occurs, MetaStock once again points out the syntax errors
>that were stored. Many of our users have taken this to be a bug in the
>update process for formulas. What is actually happening is that the
>program
>is merely pointing out that the formula cannot be updated to the new
>version
>because of the syntax error that was originally saved.
>
>With that said, there is a quirk in the use of formula names in the Fml()
>calls. Many of our users have taken advantage of the fact that a PARTIAL
>name can be used to reference another formula. Sometimes, when a formula
>file is being upgraded, an error can appear where there was a valid Fml()
>reference before. I can give a discussion of the details of this quirk if
>anybody wants it. Short of that discussion, it is always better to use
>FULL
>NAME REFERENCES in your Fml() function calls.
>
>Ken Hunt
>Programming Manager
>Equis International
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ron Stockstill [mailto:stocks@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 2:50 PM
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: MetaStock 7.02 EOD
>
>
>Chuck,
>
>My experience was not quite the same; but I would agree with
>using the Edit function. If you find a problem, you will
>want to correct it (even by comments). The formula
>editor does require valid syntax; my experience was the plot
>failed so then I went and used the editor.
>
>Of course, doing this prep work may not insure a clean upgrade,
>but I would bet it increases your odds.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ron
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
</x-flowed>
|