|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ton,
I am continually amazed at your astute ability to turn a simple discussion into a snide and sarcastic exchange.
I am not interested in using either i.e. or outlook especially when your particular post type is the only time I
experience this. I will just continue to delete them (and many others of yours that you have not seen fit to run
through a spell checker).
You seem very knowledgeable, expert, and extremely bright, and at times this is just not enough to trump your
condescending attitude. There is more to life than being "right" all the time. E.G. graciousness, kindness,
politeness.
"A.J. Maas" wrote:
> Windows runs on 95% of the PC's in the world.
> Internet Explorer on 80% of the PC's in the world, thus Outlook Express on 80%.
>
> Now lets see the usage of the fast majority of loosers:
> old-hat netscap and eudora and the likes.....15-3-2.
> That makes that the minority is having problems, not the majority.
>
> Let's translate this over to MSK
>
> MSK 7.x and 6.x are the most current and update programs
> MSK 4.x and 5.x are dying out, MSK 3..x for DOS and older will have all fanished
> and thus be the lessest used programs.
>
> Should members now, when posting also still have to make provisions
> for the handfull of DOS 3.x and 5.x users? In Formula's, Explorations, SysTests?
> For those not whising to go modern?
>
> Come of it, stop whining and set your program settings right or better, dump the user
> unfriendly programs made by those loosers and start upgrading to a modern-day software.
> I think this is the Nth time over the past 3 years that quick and effective solutions were
> provide here, and still these immense impopular programs are+were the causes of
> giving users the same unfriendly errors.
>
> Fine programs they are indeed. Perhaps we should all go back to old DOS, and
> live pc-life in the dark ages again.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Cash" <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: zaterdag 5 augustus 2000 5:55
> Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
>
> > Netscape is free, granted, not old, though. My life will not be the lesser if I just delete. Your post is
> > the only problem that I have such as this. Possibly you could make some adjustment as it seems I am not
> > the only one to experience this.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> >
> > > history repeats itselve...................................(see the many prev mails on the html-subject)
> > >
> > > for years there have been html-compatible software packages around
> > >
> > > ships along freely (thus for FREE) with your OS
> > >
> > > (still +) AND UP TILL NOW, this as a particular judge, being part of the white-collor-DOJ-mob,
> > > and some blooper companies have recently tried to prevent this
> > > (and see your now inconsistant reactions stemming from it for results)
> > >
> > > also freely available too as seperate installable programs
> > >
> > > thus either, use the already FREE provided provision and upgrade to modern software
> > >
> > > or, but not advisable for the painfull waiste, send bug-reports to your old + out-dated
> > > program providers and their too-lazy-and-therefore-being-loosers-too manufacturers.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dan Cash" <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: vrijdag 4 augustus 2000 16:30
> > > Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> > >
> > > > Well, I for one, am not edified.
> > > >
> > > > Dan
> > > >
> > > > "g.g." wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Here the same, with Eudora Pro 4.2.
> >
> >
|