|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Your other option, ton, is to post what I and numerous others consider
useless diatribes elsewhere.
If that is too much to ask, I'm stuck with twitting you unless you choose
to mark your occasional rants "ton's useless diatribes" so that I can easily
trash them.
HerrDrJagow, esq.
<<For a change, start posting possitively [sic] + possitively [sic]
contributing or else..........you leave me with no other option......>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 5:14 PM
> To: Metastock-List
> Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
>
>
> Is that racial discrimination?
>
> By this you are violating the List rules....................
>
> Then moderate or else I can see no other means than to request
> for your delisting.
>
> For a change, start posting possitively + possitively
> contributing or else..........you
> leave me with no other option.......
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: maandag 7 augustus 2000 8:45
> Subject: RE: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
>
>
> > Okay, poor pathetic Dutchman, I will, this time, publicly ask
> you to stop
> > fouling this thread with your useless diatribes.
> >
> > Oh, for a moderated list.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 2:33 PM
> > > To: Metastock-List
> > > Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> > >
> > >
> > > You too can always opt to upgrade to a modern mailer. That was
> > > already once before
> > > litterly spelled out to you, not a long time ago. Have you been
> > > asleep all of that time?
> > >
> > > Else, be happy with the by you desired viewing limitations of
> > > your current mail program.
> > > Limitations that, as was also explained before, are caused by the
> > > use of your very
> > > limited version of a < for businesses use only > terminal
> > > mailprogram (Outlook)
> > > (terminal=dummie programs, no user innitiatives and/or user
> > > enhancements allowed).
> > >
> > > And you know too what you can therefore do with yours +
> others reluctant
> > > stubborness and silly pathatic remark mails (note: in the end, I
> > > am not the one who
> > > is having problems and/or is being forced to have to live with
> > > unwanted programs limits).
> > >
> > > Also if you haven't got anything sensable to ask, I would prefer
> > > you not to use my private
> > > mailbox(es). You are a List-member, I do not know you other than
> > > from some of the
> > > listposts, then also post directly to the List. I am not
> > > intrested to receive any of the list's fool's
> > > mails other than by the natural list-route (And your mail can
> > > then be put onto the pile
> > > of the by some other fools send irrelevant junk).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>
> > > To: <ms-irb@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: zondag 6 augustus 2000 20:30
> > > Subject: RE: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hey ton,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to be able to read some of your posts so how about
> > > posting the
> > > > useless diatribes elsewhere?
> > > >
> > > > An alternative would be to make the header "ton's useless
> > > diatribes" so that
> > > > Outlook could trash them :)
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Bob
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 7:15 AM
> > > > > To: Metastock-List
> > > > > Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thick as a brick. Are you continuing to send irrelevant and
> > > > > non-List related messages?
> > > > > Look at the subject line above and now your "contribution", eh
> > > > > the not ever related remarks.
> > > > > Honour your name and make some, enabling you to face up with the
> > > > > real world.
> > > > >
> > > > > You are the single one or two that are having problems
> with that-what-
> > > > > -was-unwantedly-be-added-to-the-subject, THEN FIX IT OR BEAT IT.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not before long we will also see again a revival of the sending
> > > > > of "attachments" issue
> > > > > coming to life again.........................no way, Hosay -
> > > no can do.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ton Maas
> > > > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Dan Cash" <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: zaterdag 5 augustus 2000 18:50
> > > > > Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ton,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am continually amazed at your astute ability to turn a simple
> > > > > discussion into a snide and sarcastic exchange.
> > > > > > I am not interested in using either i.e. or outlook especially
> > > > > when your particular post type is the only time I
> > > > > > experience this. I will just continue to delete them (and many
> > > > > others of yours that you have not seen fit to run
> > > > > > through a spell checker).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You seem very knowledgeable, expert, and extremely bright, and
> > > > > at times this is just not enough to trump your
> > > > > > condescending attitude. There is more to life than being
> > > > > "right" all the time. E.G. graciousness, kindness,
> > > > > > politeness.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
|