[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The driving force behind technical analysis



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Mark,
    I know that many on this list will not like that I would choose to reply
in agreement with you (you have a way of creating discord), and I will
be the first to tell someone that I am no professional trader (yet)......but
even as much an amateur that I am, I can understand the truth of what
you have just said.

   Adam


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "metastock" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Omega List"
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 1:09 PM
Subject: The driving force behind technical analysis


> The driving force behind technical analysis, to true life saga played
> out in the hot Texas sun two years ago on a multilane stretch of road
> under construction. As I set parked in traffic waiting for the Lady
> Officer to waive myself and the multitudes of course behind me. I
> thought perhaps she may have fallen asleep behind those deeply tented
> sunglasses she was wearing so I gently beeped my horn just make sure
> if she had fallen asleep I could get her awaken before she hit the
> pavement.
>
> But  evidently  she  in  fact was not asleep and did not appreciate my
> actions no matter how good my intentions. As I set there now with half
> of  Dallas's  population  who own cars behind me, I watched three more
> red  lights  turned green and back to read without moving so much as a
> foot. So in what I thought was the best interest of the general public
> communicate  my  feelings  of  claustrophobia  both  mechanically  and
> manually  by making verbal sounds with my mouth. Evidently she did not
> have  a  great  appreciation  for my concern of her lack of ability to
> perform  her  given  task.
>
> Of  all things as a reward for my failed efforts are received a ticket
> issued  for  disorderly  conduct.  Having long experience with matters
> like  these,  I  knew it was futile to do anything, other than send it
> over  to  attorney  who  was driving a Volkswagen that needed paint 20
> years ago and who's secretaries are now driving Mercedes. So anyway my
> attorney  whose a smart lady knows the ropes around the Dallas traffic
> judicial  system  pretty  well.  She knows the longer something can be
> postponed  the  more  likely it can be dismissed.
>
> In  this  case  we were hoping that maybe the female officer's live in
> might  become pregnant and the officer would need to find a less risky
> line  of  work  to  support her lover and baby. ;- ) Or something else
> like   that,   which   would   help  maintain  my  absolutely  perfect
> non-criminal  history.  Well there was that one exception back in 1979
> when  the  Fed's  got  all upset over an article in Soldier Of Fortune
> magazine.  But  you're  not  a  real  Texan  unless you have the Fed's
> investigating  you  at  some point in your life.
>
> As  I was driving back for my court victory this morning, I realized a
> couple  of  things. One is I have a car that is five years old and has
> less  than  40,000  miles on it. Secondly I discovered that driving is
> like  technical  analysis, I mean exactly the same. I will demonstrate
> correlation  between  the  two.  Priding  myself  somewhat as an alert
> driver  well  aware  of  his  surroundings. I observed that when I was
> approaching an intersection I would immediately start to scope out the
> participants  at  the  red  light in front me.
>
> I  started  to  group them first by the most obvious indication that I
> saw  which  was  newness of the vehicle. The theory being if a car was
> smoking  from  the  tail  pipe or has dull paint and is leaning to one
> side  it  probably  will  not  be up to my acceleration criteria. As I
> approach  the participants in front of me having accumulated the input
> data and stored it as to the newness of the vehicles etc.
>
> I  realized  I was on to the next indicator which I rely upon, that is
> the  numbers  of  occupants  in  the vehicle. The theory been the more
> participants,  the more conversation that will have been a less likely
> that will be paying attention when the light turns during - thus again
> not  meeting  acceleration  criteria to follow it. Next I observe what
> the  operator  of the vehicle is doing, if they're smoking I take that
> into  account.  If  they're eating, drinking are talking on the phone,
> each  one of these different inputs is placed into my formula and will
> have  a bearing on my decision " who" to lineup behind at that the red
> light.
>
> I  then  turn my attention to try and differentiate age, this judgment
> is  made  by the observation of posture, hair color, hair length - and
> oddly  enough  the make of car. I even go as far as to observe the car
> has door handles are not in the traditional sense, meaning those which
> protrude from the body off the vehicle. Lots of older people by Buicks
> because  the  one  of the few vehicles that is manufactured that still
> has  door  handles.  Of  course  experience in plays a big hand in the
> dissemination  of  the  information,  and  has  a direct impact on the
> output  decision.
>
> A  red  low-slung  sports  car  does  not necessarily become the first
> choice  to  line  up  behind,  its occupants may be a male and female.
> Under this scenario you still have to evaluate other variables such as
> the  age  difference  between the male and female occupants. Simply to
> say  that their male and female does not automatically imply that they
> would  be  hot  lovers  who  are  more  interested  in each other than
> driving.  They could be father daughter just as well, that throws them
> into  whole  other  category.  If  on the other hand the occupants are
> clearly  boyfriend girlfriend - that's one thing. If the male is using
> this  cell  phone,  this  would  be  a  larger  detriment  than if his
> girlfriend  was  using  the  cell  phone.  The distance separating the
> boyfriend  girlfriend should also be taken into account.
>
> Items  such  as  bumper  stickers, and what they say will have bearing
> upon  my  decision  as  I  continued to analyze the traffic slowing in
> front  of  me.  Answer me this, why would anyone have a bumper sticker
> that  says  if you can read this then you're too close? This is a sure
> sign  that the driver of this vehicle fully understands that the world
> is passing them by, and they have absolutely no desire to try and keep
> up. On the other hand I fully appreciate those big yellow signs in the
> rear  glass  which  say  baby  on  board.  These  people truly must be
> recognized   for   their  brilliance.
>
> With  one  small  sign  they've  accomplished  both my goals and their
> goals.  There  goals are to keep me from pile driving than those of my
> car  into  the  rear  end  of their vehicle at a speed which he surely
> twice what they are driving.
>
> My  goals  which  they  are  helping  me  to  obtain  is  to  identify
> slow-moving  obstacles  which  are  clearly  not  conducive  to proper
> traffic  flow.
>
> I  could  go  on and down about possible various scenarios of infinite
> numbers  of combinations of the technical analysis of driving. Just as
> I  could about trading, I think if I had to summarize I would say that
> all  the input data in the world doesn't matter by itself. Being alert
> and  a  good observer is quintessential to survival and advancement in
> the human race. Very few people are truly observant and aware of every
> aspect of life and work. So it is in trading the same.
>
> Mark Brown
>
>
>