PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.3825.1300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Fib = also known as the yabberish "mother" of all
man-made-up-hoaxes-and-other-nonsense.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Has been a figure of a late very dark past, roughly a Millenium ago,
and in the mean time uncovered as a duplicator and exporter</DIV>
<DIV>of Arabic/North-African sales-calculation-methods.</DIV>
<DIV>Was also known and unmasked for its irrelevant <FONT
size=2>non-relational figures</FONT><FONT size=2> sequence, eg a kid could have
come </FONT><FONT size=2>up with </FONT><FONT size=2>his sequence</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>fantasy, </FONT><FONT size=2>and neither it had any
</FONT><FONT size=2>scientificaly nor mathematicaly value, and therefore
neither </FONT><FONT size=2>has it prooven to show a thing, eg
for</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>being a relational value or of relationship(s)
</FONT><FONT size=2>between figures or of anything, and is </FONT><FONT
size=2>only being </FONT><FONT size=2>used by and was in the
last century</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>only promoted by artists.</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>(Possibly, that's too why the Waves on the BYY </FONT><FONT
size=2>gif </FONT><FONT size=2>are </FONT><FONT size=2>wrongly calculated (and
placed), and why most of the time the calculated</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Elliot Wave </FONT><FONT size=2>theory doesn't work, where the
pictural theory most of the time does).</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV></FONT><FONT size=2>The HOAX :</DIV></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>08/25/87 HIGH 2746.65 * 61.8 = 1697.43 =
- odd value(38.2) % </FONT><FONT size=2>(2746.65-1697.43) /
(2746.65*0.01) = 1049.22 / 27.4665 = 38.2 % </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The FACTS: </FONT><FONT
size=2>{Disclaimer: in this instance it works out well, eg > 99%
correct, but naturaly will not always !!}</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>10/20/87 </FONT><FONT size=2>LOW 1616.21</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>08/25/87 HIGH 2746.65 * 58.84 = 1616.21 = - 41.16
% (2746.65-1616.21) / (2746.65*0.01) = 1130.44 / 27.4665 =
41.16 %</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>now using the Cyfferinge-circle:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>08/25/87 HIGH 2746.65 * 58.33 = 1602.12 = - 41.67
% (2746.65-1602.12) / (2746.65*0.01) = 1143.98 / 27.4665 =
41.67 %</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>See my "Re: Bartjens" mails for info on the TRUE meaning of
Figural Relationsships that can (only) be accomplished by</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>using the self-confirming </FONT><FONT size=2>Cyfferinge
circle </FONT><FONT size=2>(Ring of Figures, eg the Bartjens-Law).</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas<BR><A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Dismiss the
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.<BR>Homepage <A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas">http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
|