[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What options to sell?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.3825.1300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Fib =&nbsp;also known as the yabberish "mother" of&nbsp;all 
man-made-up-hoaxes-and-other-nonsense.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Has been a figure of a late very&nbsp;dark past, roughly a Millenium ago, 
and in the mean time uncovered as a duplicator and exporter</DIV>
<DIV>of Arabic/North-African sales-calculation-methods.</DIV>
<DIV>Was also&nbsp;known&nbsp;and unmasked for its&nbsp;irrelevant <FONT 
size=2>non-relational figures</FONT><FONT size=2> sequence, eg a kid could have 
come </FONT><FONT size=2>up with </FONT><FONT size=2>his sequence</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>fantasy, </FONT><FONT size=2>and neither it had any 
</FONT><FONT size=2>scientificaly nor mathematicaly value,&nbsp;and therefore 
neither </FONT><FONT size=2>has it&nbsp;prooven&nbsp;to show a thing, eg 
for</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>being&nbsp;a relational value or of relationship(s) 
</FONT><FONT size=2>between figures or of anything, and is </FONT><FONT 
size=2>only being </FONT><FONT size=2>used by and was in the 
last&nbsp;century</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>only&nbsp;promoted&nbsp;by artists.</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>(Possibly, that's too why the Waves on the BYY </FONT><FONT 
size=2>gif </FONT><FONT size=2>are </FONT><FONT size=2>wrongly calculated (and 
placed), and why most of the time the calculated</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Elliot Wave </FONT><FONT size=2>theory doesn't work, where the 
pictural theory most of the time does).</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV></FONT><FONT size=2>The HOAX&nbsp; :</DIV></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>08/25/87 HIGH 2746.65 *&nbsp;61.8&nbsp;= 1697.43&nbsp; = 
-&nbsp;odd value(38.2) %&nbsp;</FONT><FONT size=2>(2746.65-1697.43) / 
(2746.65*0.01) = 1049.22 / 27.4665 = 38.2 %&nbsp;</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The FACTS:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT><FONT 
size=2>{Disclaimer: in this instance it works out&nbsp;well, eg &gt; 99% 
correct, but naturaly will not always !!}</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>10/20/87&nbsp;</FONT><FONT size=2>LOW 1616.21</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>08/25/87 HIGH 2746.65 * 58.84 = 1616.21 = - 41.16 
%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (2746.65-1616.21) / (2746.65*0.01) = 1130.44 / 27.4665 = 
41.16 %</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>now using the Cyfferinge-circle:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>08/25/87 HIGH 2746.65 * 58.33 = 1602.12 = - 41.67 
%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (2746.65-1602.12) / (2746.65*0.01) = 1143.98 / 27.4665 = 
41.67 %</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>See my "Re: Bartjens" mails for info on the TRUE meaning of 
Figural Relationsships&nbsp;that can (only)&nbsp;be accomplished by</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>using the self-confirming </FONT><FONT size=2>Cyfferinge 
circle </FONT><FONT size=2>(Ring of Figures, eg the Bartjens-Law).</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas<BR><A 
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Dismiss the 
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.<BR>Homepage&nbsp; <A 
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A></DIV></BODY></HTML>

</x-html>