[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Access and TA



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-flowed>
Hi Walter,
Pain and suffering are the price we (still) have to pay for the eating of 
one single apple. Excercise: Calculate the compound interest.
Re. X-cess2000 maybe another word to the wise: If you're seriously 
considering to build a database of equities you should program it in "pure" 
SQL only (insofar as the beasty exists at all). Then, after you data have 
grown out of playground size (and they will), you'll be able to switch 
relatively painlessly (back to the "blood, sweat & tears" category again) 
to a real database engine from Access' Jet engine which cannot cope with 
other than playground size amounts of data.
Kind regards & happy trading,
Jan Willem


At 12:35 26.09.2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Jan Willem
>
>Thanks for your reply
>
>Don't know what I'd do without lots of "pain and suffering" <G>
>
>Will check out Access 2000 or is it called X-cess 2000.
>
>Best regards
>
>Walter
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "J.W.E. Roberts" <jan.roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:49 AM
>Subject: Re: Access and TA
>
>
>| Hi Walter,
>| >I just got a copy of Access 97 (my first excursion into databases) and
>would
>| >be interested in hearing about how anyone uses it in their trading.
>| >Hopefully the learning curve with Access and VBA for Access won't be as
>| >steep as the learning curve was for Excel and Excel VBA.
>| I'd strongly recommend that you get a copy of Access2000! Access97 has the
>| old & kludgy interface; also its macro-language is not VBA. Access2000 is
>| the 1st. Access that's been fully integrated in the Office (2000) suite.
>| Using A2k will save you a lot of pain & time.
>| Kind regards & hyppy trading,
>| Jan Willem
>|
</x-flowed>