|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
One of the listers wrote:
> ... The larger the trader trades, the more disgust that they generally
> ...present with ...
Whatever his personal experience on this issue is, we shouldn't discourage the best
on the List from sharing their trading "secrets". You, successful guys, be sure,
there is no "disgust" on my part <g>.
Second, regarding
> ...There is significant contempt for the trading discussions, etc. on the List
>... by those who monitor the List...
I disagree here again. Yes, there is a minority, mostly, I guess, novices
who believe that to learn which button to push in Metastock is the major
issue to tackle in this business. But in reality all of us have a chance
to learn here, on the List, FREE what otherwise we would have to pay 1,000s
$ for. And in most cases, that would be time and money wasted, IMHO.
Let's use more actively and accurately 'Subject' line and filters. One can
filter out everything with "Off topic" subject. Also, if someone hates to
read what a particular lister writes, make a filter to direct his miserable posts
directly to Trash folder <g>. After all, why not to behave like grown-ups - not
expecting everybody's writing to accommodate our own tastes, unless, of course, it
goes far beyond a common sense.
And, finally,
Jim, please don't do this: "I decided to no longer discuss my weekly picks on the
list. I'll limit my comments, if any, to pure Metastock issues." Your posts about
trading TAUGHT ME A LOT, even though I trade differently.
Vitaly
Walter Lake wrote:
> Hi Christian
>
> Just because one person "lost it", doesn't mean that we all need to go off
> the deep end. There's more to this than you know.
>
> With David, you have the wrong "who's who".
>
> There is significant contempt for the trading discussions, etc. on the List
> by those who monitor the List. Jim and Rick are the only ones who have
> voiced their opinions.
>
> The larger the trader trades, the more disgust that they generally present
> with.
>
> =============
>
> For those who wrote about the Statistical programs evaluation in this months
> Futures Mag, you might want to look at something more "passive" first <G>,
>
> http://members.aol.com/johnp71/javasta2.html
>
> STATISTICA, even in demo format, is a rocket ride, so you better fasten your
> seat beat. It is a fully functioning program not a "guided demo". It hits
> you with pop-up menus and cascading screens. Enjoy.
>
> To Philip, you might want to check out the STATISTICA histograms on page 60
> re the different bar pattern trading results (NR7, IN4, etc.)
>
> Best regards
>
> Walter
|