PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
With their CD verification, Equis has already taken the first step.
Whether or not they decide to increase their security procedures is up
to them. Whatever they do, we won't have a choice. It is, after
all, their software and their company. In the future, with the acceptance
of the USB interface, it will be far more difficult to illegally copy software.
Software companies will use a module which plugs into the USB port, similar
to what Omega Research already has for the parallel port.
Software companies are tired of getting ripped off, particularly overseas.
Don't expect the situation to remain the same forever.
Daniel.
Lionel Issen wrote:
Ray:You said it
straight. I hope, but don't expect, Equis to pay attention.Copy protection
schemes are much less secure (relatively speaking) than unbreakable ciphers.
The 'unbreakable' trapdoor codes were broken, within a few months of their
announcement, by 2 researchers using an Apple 2e ( at that time the 386
was on the market). As programs like CopyPC and CopyCat showed, copy protection
schemes for floppies are useless. This also applies to CDs.Lionel
Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From:Raymond
Hodge
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 7:23
PM
Subject: Re: MS 7.0 EOD Upgrade Screen.
New Features?
Yes thank you, I remember the copy protection schemes of the 80s.
They were totally useless in stopping dishonest people from making illegal
copies. As I recall, apps, which were only useful for getting around those
schemes, were as hot a business back then as virus apps and security apps
appear to be now. Remember CopyIIPC? They even had a special board you
could put in your machine to run the protected disks through to undo the
protection scheme.
The whole thing was a bad joke. All those silly schemes did was manage
to inconvenience and anger those of us foolish enough to be honest and
buy and run the copy protected versions.
Dishonest people are going to get around what ever scheme they apply
to this problem - other than continual and vigorous law enforcement. That's
why we have Cops (God bless them). To prosecute people who break the law.
Don't make your customers angry because people in Asia (as you say)
are stealing from you. Get our politicians to negotiate the Asian politicians
into passing laws that stops those activities, and then get them to enforce
them. Isn't that why we pay and put up with politicians?
IMO, CD verification is another dumb idea that wastes the users time,
the programmers time (which would be much better spent cleaning out bugs
and making this app more robust) and in the end likely won't even do what
it is intended to do.
MetaStock has been a source of much income for me. I want only the best
for them. I've always bought every upgrade - whatever - even if I didn't
need it - just to try and contribute to their profits. I just don't want
to see them continuing down the CompuTrac road (ignoring customers, know
it all, ever more corporate) to oblivion.
IMO, they improved the Reuters download thing considerably. That proves
that they have it in them. But they won't fix a broken wheel that doesn't
squeak. And it doesn't help to pretend that the emperor has a lovely suite
of clothes on when he's actually buck naked (and ugly).
Thanks for reminding me,
Ray
*I think Equis is doing this to prevent people,
who didn't buy v6.52 EOD, from receiving the upgrade price. I assume
this is also why they require you verify you have the MetaStock CD.
Apparently, Equis (or Reuters) is concerned about illegal copying.
I can't really blame them. There's a LOT of illegal copying taking
place in the Eastern European block nations, in Russia, and particularly
in Asia. MicroSoft recently sued a company in China but the Chinese
court ruled in favor of the company saying there was "no proof" any copying
occurred. Right. If this activity continues, expect American
software companies to take more drastic measures to protect themselves.
This will include setting up "regions" similar to the DVD video market.
They may even revive the copy protection schemes which were used during
the 80's.
D.M.
|