|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
You can easily install Win2000 in dual boot mode, so that you can
always boot back into DOS or Win98. Just leave your current OS on the
C: drive, and install Win2000 on D:. When it boots, Win2000 will
offer to let you boot the old OS.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:52:54 -0800, "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Yngvi
>
>Have you tried running any DOS programs? We still have a bunch of Clipper
>programs we run in a DOS Window under Win98SE. I don't want to take the
>time to convert these to MS as we are constantly developing new programs and
>all that my dad write are in Clipper.
>
>I have Win2000 Professional but haven't installed it since I read about all
>of the potential problems. I have 196MB of RAM so I don't think that memory
>will be a problem.
>
>Guy
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
>Behalf Of Yngvi Hardarson
>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 1:31 AM
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: MS 7.0 Pro and Windows 2000
>Importance: High
>
>I am using 128 MB RAM. My computer is otherwise performing great. I.e. no
>signs of RAM shortage. Using the Workstation version of 2K
>
>Yngvi
>hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
>Behalf Of Bradley C. Mitchell
>Sent: 22. febrúar 2000 20:24
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Equis Support (E-mail)
>Subject: RE: MS 7.0 Pro and Windows 2000
>
>How much ram do you have, win2000 needs atleast 128k if its the Prof version
>Server requires 256 or more
>
>Brad
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Yngvi Hardarson
>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 2:07 PM
>To: Metastock list (E-mail)
>Cc: Equis Support (E-mail)
>Subject: MS 7.0 Pro and Windows 2000
>Importance: High
>
>
>Hi List / Equis Support!
>
>Just upgraded from Win98 to Win2000. Explorations much slower now. I guess
>by a multiple of 3-4, i.e. going at 1/3 to 1/4 speed.
>I don't think it has anything to do with the file system as tried both with
>FAT32 and NTFS.
>
>Anybody got a clue?
>
>Best regards,
>Yngvi
>hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
|