|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>
>Walter writes:
>Most of the discussion on the List is about ad-hoc methods and rules
patched
>together. There is no common methodology or statistical basis. Even the
>"leaders" in the field TASC, Futures Mag, Metastock etc. work from a "quasi
>empirical" basis without an established method.
>
Another very interesting post, Walter.
Your post begs the question: As serious traders, would it behoove us to
strive for consistent statistical methodology as the basis for stock
selection, and timing in entry and exit?
Nicholas
|