|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1706"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Claud,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I'll jump in on this one as I have the URL
handy:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="http://www.profitunity.com/";>http://www.profitunity.com/</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Charles</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Claud Baruch <<A
href="mailto:ClaudB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ClaudB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Sunday, October 24, 1999 12:01 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Bill Williams
Indicator Encoding<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>Jeff,<BR><BR>Do you have the URL
for for the Investor's Dream
Demo?<BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Claud<BR><BR>Jeff wrote:<BR><BR>> Thanks for
the codes Gary. Even though I didn't ask for them I decided to<BR>>
take a look. Heck I'm even downloading the Investor's Dream Demo so
that I<BR>> can see how they are
used.<BR>><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Oct 24 22:07:45 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA19191
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 09:36:13 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA05053
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:26:55 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA05050
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:26:52 -0600
Received: from mail.rdc1.md.home.com (imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.2.2.66])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA29601
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 10:13:17 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from cj52561a ([24.13.243.16]) by mail.rdc1.md.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP
id <19991024155859.WFSU18396.mail.rdc1.md.home.com@xxxxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 08:58:59 -0700
Message-ID: <000801bf1e52$bf623860$10f30d18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jim Greening" <jimginva@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Weekly Pick
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 12:05:30 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF1E18.10FB0D40"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2> <FONT size=3>All,</FONT>
<P><FONT size=3><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>I’ve been looking at the charts and finally decided on Amazon.com (AMZN)
for my weekly pick.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>As you know,
AMZN was in the $100k portfolio when I went to cash a few weeks ago.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The story here is that I think it is
really set up to take advantage of the Christmas selling season with all their
new affiliate retailers.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>AMZN <SPAN
style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">started as the world’s largest online
bookstore, but is rapidly becoming Earth's biggest online anything store.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3><SPAN style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>AMZN at 78 5/8 is in a
Short Term Up Trend Channel (STUTC) with the top at 95 ½ and the bottom at 72
5/8.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Earlier in the year, it set an
all time high of 108.3 on 4/23/99.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Then it went into a Short Term Down Trend Channel (STDTC) falling to a
double bottom of 41 on 8/5/99 and again on 8/10/99.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It rose from there to break out of its
STDTC on 8/17/99 and established the current STUTC.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It bounced off the bottom of that
channel for the second time a little over a week ago.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It’s a little further off the bottom of
the channel then I like.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>However,
if I set the target just under the old high at 108 and the stop just under the
bottom of the STUTC at 71 ¾ that gives a good reward/risk ratio of just over
4.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Then if I only purchase
enough shares to have less than 3% of my portfolio at risk
(<EM>risk = (current price minus stop price) times number share owned</EM>) I'm
well within my trading rules.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The
Tema StochRSI 13 is negative, but rising and the Tema Stoch 55 is well into
positive territory.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That usually
suggests a good entry point.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The
fundamentals are typical of an internet company – bad <G>.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The earnings are negative, the
debt/equity is high at 2.54, and the price/sales is an extremely high
21.59.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Offsetting the otherwise bad
fundamentals is a fantastic revenue growth rate of almost 200% per year.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I expect this will continue and AMZN
should have an extraordinary Christmas sales season.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3><SPAN
style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> See chart at <A
href="http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/";>http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/</A></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><SPAN style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"></SPAN> </P>
<P><FONT size=3><SPAN
style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">JimG<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3><SPAN style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><SPAN style="mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Oct 24 22:07:55 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA19272
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 09:46:04 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA05153
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:44:14 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA05146
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:44:10 -0600
Received: from mail.rdc1.md.home.com (imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.2.2.66])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA29609
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 10:30:33 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from cj52561a ([24.13.243.16]) by mail.rdc1.md.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP
id <19991024161617.WJAD18396.mail.rdc1.md.home.com@xxxxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 09:16:17 -0700
Message-ID: <002801bf1e55$2a32f7e0$10f30d18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jim Greening" <jimginva@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <02e501bf1dc2$e40cac80$0101a8c0@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ATHM
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 12:11:39 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Bob,
I'm getting nervous with all the negatives I'm hearing about ATHM, but
so far I haven't experienced any problems. I'll stay with them as long as I
don't start having a lot of problems. If I do, I'll see what else may be
available. I did check with the cable company and found that ATHM was all
they offered. That may change in the future, but for now for broad band
access here, its ATHM with a cable modem or a much more expensive DSL hook
up.
JimG
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Jagow <bjagow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 1999 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: ATHM
> Jim,
> We are getting @home here so I asked about it on the
> qcharts onelist and got a preponderance of
> negatives -- mostly that they are a long way from
> getting their act together.
>
> Was looking for something that wouldn't bog down
> during market hours after all sorts of bad vibes from
> using my local dialup providers and MSN [hadn't tried
> Mindspring because they use the old Netcom pop] --
> just now ran into Inreach and would recommend it
> highly.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim
> Greening
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 1999 12:31 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: ATHM
>
>
> uf,
> Here's hoping they have learned and improved <G>.
> So far no problems
> here at all, but I haven't been on very long yet.
>
> JimG
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ullrich Fischer <uf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: ATHM
>
>
> > They always tell me their server or router
> related. -uf
> >
> > At 07:49 PM 10/21/99 -0700, you wrote:
> > >uf,
> > > So far, so good here, but that's on a very
> limited sample of about
> > > one week. Jones cable just put in all new fiber
> here about a year ago,
> > > so that may help. Are the problems there cable or
> server related or do
> > > you know?
> > >
> > >JimG
> > >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>From: <mailto:uf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Ullrich
> Fischer
> > >>To:
> <mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> m
> > >>Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 3:07 PM
> > >>Subject: Re: ATHM
> > >>
> > >>Another data point for you, Jim: I've had @home
> cable modem service
> from
> > >>Rogers Cable in Canada for the past month and a
> half. The service has
> > >>gone down on average 1.5 times per week for an
> average of 10 minutes at
> a
> > >>time. Today, it was down for about 1/2 hour
> during trading hours. I
> > >>had one short position in MO open at the time,
> fortunately, it kept
> going
> > >>down until the service came back up. When I
> called @HOME tech support,
> > >>they had a canned message saying they know they
> have problems with the
> > >>server for my area but don't know when it will be
> fixed.
> > >>
> > >>When the service is up, it is great, but
> reliability needs a bit more
> > >>work. If I had a choice between DSL and Cable
> modem in my area, I think
> > >>I would go for DSL.
> > >>
> > >>-uf
> > >>
> > >>At 09:09 PM 10/20/99 -0700, you wrote:
> > >>> ALL,
> > >>>
> > >>> I think today gave me a good clue to the
> question of is the
> > >>> correction over or are we starting on a bear
> market. Both the NASD
> and
> > >>> the NDX made a strong bounce off the bottom of
> their Intermediate Term
> > >>> Up Trend Channels. Also while all the other
> indices I watch remain in
> > >>> Short Term Down Trend Channels they all also
> made strong up moves. It
> > >>> would be premature to say that we had a market
> correction and it s
> over
> > >>> before the other indices break out of their down
> trends, but I m going
> > >>> to nibble based on today s strong hint. Since
> the NASD and OEX are
> the
> > >>> ones in up trends, I limited my candidates to
> the Internet and high
> > >>> tech stocks. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
> > >>> "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
> > >>>
> > >>> I finally narrowed my choice down to At
> Home Corp (ATHM). The
> > >>> story here is that I just switched to a cable
> modem from ATHM and
> Jones
> > >>> Cable TV and I m greatly impressed with their
> service. I download at
> > >>> 100 times the speed of my old 56k modem and
> upload at twice the
> > >>> speed. That got me curious and when I looked
> into ATHM in more
> detail,
> > >>> I found that they are adding customers at an
> astonishing rate. Based
> > >>> on my own excitement and pleasure with the fast
> Internet access, I
> > >>> really think this can be a big winner. I haven
> t got time to go into
> > >>> the chart tonight, but I have posted it. Just
> click on the symbol
> > >>> below to see the chart. You will see that it is
> typical of my usual
> picks.
> > >>>
> > >>> See Chart at
> > >>>
> <http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/>http://www.geociti
> es.com/jimginva/
> > >>>
> > >>>JimG
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
>
>
>
|