|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I understand that you would have to run Windows NT
as a server with the assigned DNS address. The other computers on your network
would then treat the NT machine as the Server. The same goes for Cable. This
presumes that you want all computers to communicate to the internet at the same
time. If you can live with one machine at a time, it is not such a big
problem.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Gerrit</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:mrobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=mrobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Michael
Robb</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, September 08, 1999 2:49
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Multiple PCs on one ISP
line</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Lionel...........and others:<BR><BR>Was it you who spoke, some
months ago, about connecting multiple PCs on one<BR>ISP (or ISDN) line
with a purely software solution?<BR><BR>Did it have something to do with
Windows 98 Second Edition?<BR><BR>I want to run 2 PCs w/ W98 in one room, and
1 PC w/W95 in another room on<BR>one ISDN line.<BR><BR>Is there a sw solution
to this, via the phone line? Or must I cable them all<BR>together.<BR><BR>What
is a good solution to this excercise?<BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
scheier <<A
href="mailto:scheier@xxxxxxxxx";>scheier@xxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>To: <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Date:
Wednesday, September 08, 1999 4:07 PM<BR>Subject: Re: Meta's fib
tool<BR><BR><BR>>Perhaps, but their markets are somewhat
different. Metastock does a<BR>better<BR>>job than Supercharts,
but as you can see from this list, many users grow<BR>out of<BR>>its
limitations and then feel forced to move on to Tradestation.
Equis<BR>>doesn't realize this, but this gives them bad press, and causes
many new<BR>>traders to begin with a software that has better upgrade path,
namely<BR>Omega.<BR>>They are tantalized by Tradestation, but start out
with Supercharts. If<BR>you<BR>>start out with Metastock, where
do you go to stay with Equis? You don't.<BR>>You consider
leaving instead.<BR>><BR>>It seems to me that they have come so close in
so many ways not to take the<BR>>extra thought into their development
path.<BR>><BR>>In any case, good luck with your
trading....<BR>><BR>>Scheier<BR>><BR>>Lionel Issen
wrote:<BR>><BR>>> Mark:<BR>>><BR>>> I've come to the sad
conclusion that Equis doesn't really care and that<BR>>> they think they
have an exclusive franchise (that is franchise as Warren<BR>>> Buffett
defines it). If Omega provided better service manuals and
online<BR>>> help, they would take away Equis'
market.<BR>>><BR>>> Lionel Issen<BR>>> ----- Original
Message -----<BR>>> From: scheier <<A
href="mailto:scheier@xxxxxxxxx";>scheier@xxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>> To:
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 9:30 AM<BR>>> Subject: Re: Meta's
fib tool<BR>>><BR>>> > I shouldn't be surprised to learn this
deficiency has been posted to<BR>this<BR>>> list<BR>>> >
before. I'm a fairly new member. Once about 2
years ago I got<BR>>> someone on the<BR>>> > line at Equis and
tried to discuss this issue. It was clearly an<BR>>> example
of being<BR>>> > unable to think outside the box. The box
being defined by the lowest<BR>>> common<BR>>> > denominator of
established technical analysis tools.<BR>>> ><BR>>> > If
Equis would start thinking in terms of Open Architecture instead
of<BR>>> Predefined<BR>>> > Terms, they just might be able to
leap into the market opportunity left<BR>>> open by bug<BR>>> >
ridden bench of TradeStation's new releases. Is anybody
listening?<BR>>> ><BR>>> > Mark Scheier<BR>>>
><BR>>> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:<BR>>> ><BR>>> >
> Like noted before on this list, I would also prefer to see<BR>>>
> > a user definable Retracement Tool, replacing the
irrelivant<BR>>> > > clumpsy Retracement-tool that is currently
available in v6xx.<BR>>> > ><BR>>> > > For my
preferences I would like to enable it to give lines @ the<BR>>>
> > Decimal-levels
(-0-12,5-25-33.3-50-66.7-75-87.5-100+112.5+125+<BR>>> > >
133.3+150 etc.), and having "optional" checkboxes (eg to switch<BR>>>
> > some of the lines on and off, from time to time, for better
chart<BR>>> readability).<BR>>> > ><BR>>> > >
Regards,<BR>>> > > Ton Maas<BR>>> > > <A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>>>
> > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying
and<BR>>> > > note the new address change. Also for my
Homepage<BR>>> > > <A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A><BR>>>
> ><BR>>> > > ----- Original Message -----<BR>>> >
> From: scheier <<A
href="mailto:scheier@xxxxxxxxx";>scheier@xxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>> >
> To: Metalist <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>>
> > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 1999 20:28<BR>>> > > Subject:
Meta's fib tool<BR>>> > ><BR>>> > > > Concerning
limitations of the Metastock fibonacci retracement<BR>>> > > >
tool. It seems to use these levels: 68%, 50%, 38%, and 25%
(75%<BR>>> > > > from the other end). Is
anyone aware of way to user-modify this<BR>>> > > > tool?--as
in a way to change the 75% to 78% etc. Has
anyone<BR>>> > > > spoken to designers at Equis about bringing
this tool up to<BR>date? --<BR>>> > > > with the work and
software of Bryce Gilmore, Robert Miner, Tom<BR>>> > > > Joseph
and about a half dozen other of their industry competitors?<BR>>> >
> > --or is there maybe just a trick I'm unaware of in the latest
or<BR>>> > > > soon-to-be released versions.<BR>>> >
> ><BR>>> > > > Mark Scheier<BR>>> > >
><BR>>> > > ><BR>>> ><BR>>>
><BR>><BR>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Sep 08 20:11:29 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA07218
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 19:56:23 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA26889
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 10:03:43 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA26884
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 10:03:41 -0600
Received: from Chicago5 (mail.chicagonet.net [207.252.246.5])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA14721
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 19:55:31 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from chicagonet.net ([209.186.4.228]) by Chicago5
with ESMTP (IPAD 2.5) id 3034900 ; Wed, 08 Sep 1999 20:41:33 -0500
Message-ID: <37D7103D.D1FC677B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 20:41:17 -0500
From: Essan Soobratty <trader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Multiple PCs on one ISP line
References: <009e01befa44$00545700$7df4cad0@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status: O
www.wingate.com
You can download fully functional software for a 30day trial. I haven't had any
problems with it. Some of my machines are running win95 and others win98.
There are a number of other software solutions depending on how much you want to
spend and the degree of control you want over the client connections.
Do an internet search under "proxy server" or check some of the free/shareware
sites.
E.
Michael Robb wrote:
> Lionel...........and others:
>
> Was it you who spoke, some months ago, about connecting multiple PCs on one
> ISP (or ISDN) line with a purely software solution?
>
> Did it have something to do with Windows 98 Second Edition?
>
> I want to run 2 PCs w/ W98 in one room, and 1 PC w/W95 in another room on
> one ISDN line.
>
> Is there a sw solution to this, via the phone line? Or must I cable them all
> together.
>
> What is a good solution to this excercise?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
>
> >Perhaps, but their markets are somewhat different. Metastock does a
> better
> >job than Supercharts, but as you can see from this list, many users grow
> out of
> >its limitations and then feel forced to move on to Tradestation. Equis
> >doesn't realize this, but this gives them bad press, and causes many new
> >traders to begin with a software that has better upgrade path, namely
> Omega.
> >They are tantalized by Tradestation, but start out with Supercharts. If
> you
> >start out with Metastock, where do you go to stay with Equis? You don't.
> >You consider leaving instead.
> >
> >It seems to me that they have come so close in so many ways not to take the
> >extra thought into their development path.
> >
> >In any case, good luck with your trading....
> >
> >Scheier
> >
> >Lionel Issen wrote:
> >
> >> Mark:
> >>
> >> I've come to the sad conclusion that Equis doesn't really care and that
> >> they think they have an exclusive franchise (that is franchise as Warren
> >> Buffett defines it). If Omega provided better service manuals and online
> >> help, they would take away Equis' market.
> >>
> >> Lionel Issen
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 9:30 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
> >>
> >> > I shouldn't be surprised to learn this deficiency has been posted to
> this
> >> list
> >> > before. I'm a fairly new member. Once about 2 years ago I got
> >> someone on the
> >> > line at Equis and tried to discuss this issue. It was clearly an
> >> example of being
> >> > unable to think outside the box. The box being defined by the lowest
> >> common
> >> > denominator of established technical analysis tools.
> >> >
> >> > If Equis would start thinking in terms of Open Architecture instead of
> >> Predefined
> >> > Terms, they just might be able to leap into the market opportunity left
> >> open by bug
> >> > ridden bench of TradeStation's new releases. Is anybody listening?
> >> >
> >> > Mark Scheier
> >> >
> >> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Like noted before on this list, I would also prefer to see
> >> > > a user definable Retracement Tool, replacing the irrelivant
> >> > > clumpsy Retracement-tool that is currently available in v6xx.
> >> > >
> >> > > For my preferences I would like to enable it to give lines @ the
> >> > > Decimal-levels (-0-12,5-25-33.3-50-66.7-75-87.5-100+112.5+125+
> >> > > 133.3+150 etc.), and having "optional" checkboxes (eg to switch
> >> > > some of the lines on and off, from time to time, for better chart
> >> readability).
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Ton Maas
> >> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and
> >> > > note the new address change. Also for my Homepage
> >> > > http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > To: Metalist <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 1999 20:28
> >> > > Subject: Meta's fib tool
> >> > >
> >> > > > Concerning limitations of the Metastock fibonacci retracement
> >> > > > tool. It seems to use these levels: 68%, 50%, 38%, and 25% (75%
> >> > > > from the other end). Is anyone aware of way to user-modify this
> >> > > > tool?--as in a way to change the 75% to 78% etc. Has anyone
> >> > > > spoken to designers at Equis about bringing this tool up to
> date? --
> >> > > > with the work and software of Bryce Gilmore, Robert Miner, Tom
> >> > > > Joseph and about a half dozen other of their industry competitors?
> >> > > > --or is there maybe just a trick I'm unaware of in the latest or
> >> > > > soon-to-be released versions.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Mark Scheier
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
|