|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I use SyGate. Recommended by someone on this list. Installed in about 30
minutes. Very low cost: $70 for 6 machines. Seamless on the client
systems. I'm running 4 NT systems and 1 95 system. SyGate is on one of my
NT systems.
Kent
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Robb <mrobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, September 09, 1999 8:11 AM
Subject: Multiple PCs on one ISP line
Lionel...........and others:
Was it you who spoke, some months ago, about connecting multiple PCs on one
ISP (or ISDN) line with a purely software solution?
Did it have something to do with Windows 98 Second Edition?
I want to run 2 PCs w/ W98 in one room, and 1 PC w/W95 in another room on
one ISDN line.
Is there a sw solution to this, via the phone line? Or must I cable them all
together.
What is a good solution to this excercise?
-----Original Message-----
From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
>Perhaps, but their markets are somewhat different. Metastock does a
better
>job than Supercharts, but as you can see from this list, many users grow
out of
>its limitations and then feel forced to move on to Tradestation. Equis
>doesn't realize this, but this gives them bad press, and causes many new
>traders to begin with a software that has better upgrade path, namely
Omega.
>They are tantalized by Tradestation, but start out with Supercharts. If
you
>start out with Metastock, where do you go to stay with Equis? You don't.
>You consider leaving instead.
>
>It seems to me that they have come so close in so many ways not to take the
>extra thought into their development path.
>
>In any case, good luck with your trading....
>
>Scheier
>
>Lionel Issen wrote:
>
>> Mark:
>>
>> I've come to the sad conclusion that Equis doesn't really care and that
>> they think they have an exclusive franchise (that is franchise as Warren
>> Buffett defines it). If Omega provided better service manuals and online
>> help, they would take away Equis' market.
>>
>> Lionel Issen
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 9:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
>>
>> > I shouldn't be surprised to learn this deficiency has been posted to
this
>> list
>> > before. I'm a fairly new member. Once about 2 years ago I got
>> someone on the
>> > line at Equis and tried to discuss this issue. It was clearly an
>> example of being
>> > unable to think outside the box. The box being defined by the lowest
>> common
>> > denominator of established technical analysis tools.
>> >
>> > If Equis would start thinking in terms of Open Architecture instead of
>> Predefined
>> > Terms, they just might be able to leap into the market opportunity left
>> open by bug
>> > ridden bench of TradeStation's new releases. Is anybody listening?
>> >
>> > Mark Scheier
>> >
>> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Like noted before on this list, I would also prefer to see
>> > > a user definable Retracement Tool, replacing the irrelivant
>> > > clumpsy Retracement-tool that is currently available in v6xx.
>> > >
>> > > For my preferences I would like to enable it to give lines @ the
>> > > Decimal-levels (-0-12,5-25-33.3-50-66.7-75-87.5-100+112.5+125+
>> > > 133.3+150 etc.), and having "optional" checkboxes (eg to switch
>> > > some of the lines on and off, from time to time, for better chart
>> readability).
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Ton Maas
>> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and
>> > > note the new address change. Also for my Homepage
>> > > http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > To: Metalist <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 1999 20:28
>> > > Subject: Meta's fib tool
>> > >
>> > > > Concerning limitations of the Metastock fibonacci retracement
>> > > > tool. It seems to use these levels: 68%, 50%, 38%, and 25% (75%
>> > > > from the other end). Is anyone aware of way to user-modify this
>> > > > tool?--as in a way to change the 75% to 78% etc. Has anyone
>> > > > spoken to designers at Equis about bringing this tool up to
date? --
>> > > > with the work and software of Bryce Gilmore, Robert Miner, Tom
>> > > > Joseph and about a half dozen other of their industry competitors?
>> > > > --or is there maybe just a trick I'm unaware of in the latest or
>> > > > soon-to-be released versions.
>> > > >
>> > > > Mark Scheier
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> >
>
>
|