|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Gerrit:<BR><BR>Dial-up would be less risky only because you are connected
for less time<BR>each day. My cable supplier said that while you're
connected, you present<BR>the same target. Actually, they said the cable
modem is safer because of<BR>built-in encryption and security features, but I'm
not convinced.<BR><BR>Regards</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:gerritmarks@xxxxxxxxxxx"; title=gerritmarks@xxxxxxxxxxx>Gerrit
Marks</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> August 22, 1999 17:42</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: persistent intruder
attack</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Do I take this to mean that those with dial up
service are less at risk than those who are online via Cable or other
continuous connection means?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Respectfully</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Gerrit Marks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Vitaly
Larichev</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, August 22, 1999 3:50
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: persistent intruder
attack</DIV><BR>>From a recent post<BR><BR>> > ...<BR>> > I
immediately disconnected from the internet.<BR>> > ...<BR><BR>Do we
overreact to dangers of intrusion?<BR><BR>I should admit that I know little
on the subject. So, the above is a question, indeed. Still, a<BR>common
sense makes me wonder, how real are these dangers?<BR><BR>What concerns me
is a possibility of giving somebody an access to private information kept on
my PC:<BR>personal data, financial records (# of credit cards, bank,
brokerage accounts). As some might have a<BR>bad luck to learn, this may
spell a long, long trouble in contrast to just temporary
unpleasantness<BR>of restoring data on HD damaged by a virus, from your
backups. Yep, I do backups regularly after I<BR>was taught a hard way (two
HD crashes with total loss of all data) a lesson on "What these
freaking<BR>backups are for?"<BR><BR>As I understand, for an outsider to
,say, read files on my PC connected to Internet, he should be<BR>able to
take over, at least partially, PC's operational system. For it, PC should
have installed a<BR>remote telecommunication program specially tailored for
these needs (an ability to transmit<BR>covertly, etc.). Not just something
standard, available on each computer like Hyperterminal in<BR>Win95. Also,
it cannot get there without your, though involuntary, participation - you
may put it in<BR>there when opening e-mail, downloading stuff from a Web
site, and so forth. Only then, I believe,<BR>you are ripe for being picked
up by an intruder. If you are "clean", the intruder may sniff out
all<BR>your ports, upper and lower, but no chances to succeed. Am I wrong on
this? Perhaps, most of these<BR>"attacks" are really innocent (like
searching for a partner to play a game), and we shouldn't get<BR>obsessed
with it? Maybe, it's a way the Web lives that we've just discovered to our
confusion?<BR><BR>Also, mind that even an intruder with an access cannot
visit your PC casually, from time to time.<BR>Each time you get connected to
the Web, you get a new Internet address, so next time you are lost<BR>for
the intruder. It's true as well for "always on" Internet connections like
cable modems: as soon<BR>as you turn off/on your PC (not sure if closing a
browser does the trick), you get a new address<BR>also.<BR><BR>Thanks for
your patience.<BR><BR>Cheers, Vitaly</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Aug 24 00:41:05 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA29647
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:16:09 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA00364
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:51:04 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA00361
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:51:02 -0600
Received: from mail.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [207.137.28.4])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02760
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:41:22 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from IXPRES.COM (06-078.015.popsite.net [192.216.7.78])
by mail.ixpres.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA38660
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <37C1E6EE.EE753EC7@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:27:26 -0700
From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Version 7.0
References: <00c701bee80c$979db7e0$5f1c4118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Anyone know if Metastock v7 is going to include built-in Nasdaq Level 2
support? I assume they will since WOW Daytrader Pro does also.
L2, Time & Sales, and email/pager alerts are just about the only major
things I can think of which are missing from Pro v6.52. Other small
features would include multiple colors for multiple plots on a custom indicator.
<p>Daniel.
<br>
<p>Glen Wallace wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I'm usually the last to know these things, but I
hear Version 7.0's release
<br>is expected next month.
<p>Apparently, the realtime version will be able to recover tick data missed
<br>while your ISP was down, for example (assuming your data provider supports
<br>this, I suppose), and "...a lot of other really neat stuff."
<p>Anyone know more?</blockquote>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Aug 24 00:41:02 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA29606
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:14:13 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA00376
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:59:56 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA00373
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:59:53 -0600
Received: from mail.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [207.137.28.4])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02764
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:50:14 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from IXPRES.COM (06-078.015.popsite.net [192.216.7.78])
by mail.ixpres.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA40396
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <37C1E902.B1C10FA2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:36:18 -0700
From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer question
References: <37C06971.44B62423@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
You probably can't play a certain 'type' of media. It either has
the MID or WAV extension. Try going into Windows MediaPlayer under
View>Options>Formats, clicking on all the types making at least one change,
then clicking on "Apply".
<p>Daniel.
<br>
<p>michael arnoldi wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>some of the sounds in my "media" folder stopped working.
<br>any idea where i can "reconnect" or fix them ?</blockquote>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Aug 24 00:41:09 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA30174
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:58:20 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA00875
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:44:47 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA00871
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:44:44 -0600
Received: from mail.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [207.137.28.4])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02790
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 19:35:05 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from IXPRES.COM (06-078.015.popsite.net [192.216.7.78])
by mail.ixpres.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA49079
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <37C1F381.FE530002@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:21:05 -0700
From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Equis Metastock Listserv Post <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Off-topic C++
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Someone mentioned MS C++ 6 for programming. Just for your info, the
listed EBAY page was for the Academic version.
<p>For most MetaStock users, I believe the MS Excel/MetaStock combo is
plenty. Most users, myself included, don't know how to program in
Visual C++. It would also be time consuming. However, if anyone
is interested in learning/programming C++, I understand Borland Builder
Pro v4 is very powerful. It is supposed to be much quicker to create
programs using Builder 4 than MS C++. This EBAY item is an example:
<br>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150290652
<p>It is Borland Builder Pro v4, Academic version. Technically, the
seller isn't supposed to sell it to you or you aren't supposed to register
it if you aren't a student. I'm not sure which. If you buy
the full retail version, it's $400 I think.
<p>Unless you want to create an indicator involving all stocks, such as
percentage of all stocks above 30 MA, I don't think it's worth the effort.
Don't forget not only would you have to learn visual C++, but you'd also
have to figure out how to access your database. It's too bad MetaStock
doesn't have the above indicator capability.
<p>Daniel.
<br> </html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Aug 24 00:41:20 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA31506
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:44:40 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA01761
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:26:54 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA01758
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:26:51 -0600
Received: from basecamp1.netquest.net (netquest.net [204.140.219.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA02844
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:17:11 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from p400 (dsl0037.netquest.net [206.117.109.37]) by basecamp1.netquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id UAA12514 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Off-topic C++
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:03:51 -0700
Message-ID: <004901beeddd$4abb5960$256d75ce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01BEEDA2.9E5C8160"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <37C1F381.FE530002@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999>Daniel</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>The
eBay link I put into my posting was for VB 6 Professional Full Version, so I
assume you're referring to someone else's post. The link I posted
was:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999><A
href="http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150039166";>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150039166</A></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>The
reason I posted that link was to tell Walter about eBay and let him know if he
had a problem getting something shipped to Canada, that I would be glad to help
if he needed it.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999>I do agree with your comments regarding C++ and I
am a programmer. I don't want to learn another language if I can help
it.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>My
problem is that MetaStock, while now able to perform all of my calculations,
does it with less precision than other languages. For the most part,
everything looks fine until we get to a +/- 10 indicator in our original
calculations. MS only calculated a value of + or - 8 (two out of the
last three occurrences), which has a material impact on our system.
Because of some of MS' limited computational capabilities, some of us
are evaluating other programming languages.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>I'm
looking at buying Visual Studio 6.0 Professional over eBay which will provide me
with VB 6.0 Professional as well as Visual FoxPro as well as a bunch of
other languages (C++ being one of them) that I won't use.
Since system currently runs under TAS, MetaStock, Clipper, and Excel,
I have to convert it over to a Y2K compliant environment. I had
hoped that MS for Windows would have been able to handle my
requirements.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>My old
Clipper and TAS programs are not Y2K compliant and MetaStock doesn't
provide me with accurate calculations. That leaves me with Excel and other
languages. I have everything currently programmed in Excel
except the MS File Library link. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>With
regards to Borland Builder Pro v4, you need to make sure that you can use it
with the MS Library DLL that provides you access to Equis' database.
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=540412402-24081999>Walter
and I were discussing VB and VBA which does support the MS DLL. Walter has
done a lot of work with Excel and VBA and has posted a ton of information here
in that regard. I, unfortunately, haven't had time to look at it, but
will as soon as the kid starts back to school. Right now, I've
settled on VB, Excel using VBA or Visual FoxPro(since our Clipper is a
xBase system). I'm trying to figure out how to use Excel with VBA
because that will minimize any coding I have to do. On the other
hand, this will limit systems testing as I won't have all of my
intermediate calculations readily available in the database. Decisions,
decisions....</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999>Regards</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999>Guy</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=540412402-24081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On Behalf Of</B> Daniel
Martinez<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 23, 1999 6:21 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Equis
Metastock Listserv Post<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Off-topic
C++<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>Someone mentioned MS C++ 6 for programming. Just
for your info, the listed EBAY page was for the Academic version.
<P>For most MetaStock users, I believe the MS Excel/MetaStock combo is
plenty. Most users, myself included, don't know how to program in Visual
C++. It would also be time consuming. However, if anyone is
interested in learning/programming C++, I understand Borland Builder Pro v4 is
very powerful. It is supposed to be much quicker to create programs using
Builder 4 than MS C++. This EBAY item is an example: <BR><A
href="http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150290652";>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150290652</A>
<P>It is Borland Builder Pro v4, Academic version. Technically, the seller
isn't supposed to sell it to you or you aren't supposed to register it if you
aren't a student. I'm not sure which. If you buy the full retail
version, it's $400 I think.
<P>Unless you want to create an indicator involving all stocks, such as
percentage of all stocks above 30 MA, I don't think it's worth the
effort. Don't forget not only would you have to learn visual C++,
but you'd also have to figure out how to access your database. It's too
bad MetaStock doesn't have the above indicator capability.
<P>Daniel. <BR> </P></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Aug 24 00:41:14 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA30863
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 19:48:16 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA01311
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 10:26:34 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA01308
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 10:26:32 -0600
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu03.email.msn.com [207.46.181.19])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02817
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:16:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pavilion - 208.253.194.62 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Mon, 23 Aug 1999 19:03:04 -0700
Message-ID: <000701beedee$5cd031a0$3ec2fdd0@xxxxxxxx>
From: "Jim Greening" <JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: DJIA Break Out
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:05:52 -0700
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
All,
We made it back late last night. Nothing much happened in the market
when I was gone except that I did switch from POTSX to POTCX on 8/13/99 when
the NDX broke out of its Short Term Down Trend Channel. However, today the
DJIA broke out to a new all time high. That's a classic trader Vic type buy
continuation signal for the large cap stocks. It may be a false break out
or it may be the start of a new up trend with the large caps leading the way
once again. I'm going to hedge by opening a new position in DELL tomorrow.
See charts at http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/Highrise/1025/
JimG
|