|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I do not intend to "fight" here but;
1. OK - You're lucky - I paid twice that for my RAM 3mths ago in Australia
(accounting for exchange rate)!
2. OK - if you run at 1600pix and can't read the displayed text even in
large font, go ahead.
3. I am a software developer and NEED the robustness of NT.
OK - I guess $US500 is equivalent to being stopped-out of 2 trades :)
Shall we end this before others on the list get tired of it?
For the sake of it, could you tell me how much RAM MS actually uses while
running. (In NT use the taskmanager).
Rgs Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Warshawsky [mailto:rwarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 19 July 1999 11:24
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Avoid problem new PC
1. 256MB cost is around $170 and you must have it in order to run you run
multiple memory intense applications
2. 16MB videocard costs from $48 to $180 and again, it must for the
Graphical User Interface (Windows)
3. You do use NT, but recommend WIN98?
Michael, please, be real and don't be penny wise and pound foolish. Just
compare, what can you get for additional $400-$500.
Regards
Ron Warshawsky
P.S. These recommendations are for educational purposes only
-----Original Message-----
From: Samerski, Michael (Australia) <msamerski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, July 18, 1999 6:29 PM
Subject: RE: Avoid problem new PC
>M2CW :
>
>Unless RAM just got cheaper, you don't NEED 256M ! A clean/fresh install of
>NT uses about 25MB with no apps running. => 64MB is adequate.
>I ran MS 6.5 on NT with 48MB happily.
>
>Looking at the video spec Ron recommend, does he think that Björn is
>building a Gaming machine? I understand he wants to do some
number-crunching
>and looking at a few charts.....
>
>NT costs about 2, 3x as much as W98. Sure it is more robust but at the cost
>of reduced performance and complexity you just don't want to spend time on.
>You want to research trading systems right? You will also find W98 MUCH
>easier to configure (eg internet etc) and get help from this list...
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ron Warshawsky [mailto:rwarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 17 July 1999 16:37
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Avoid problem new PC
>
>
>OS - NT workstation will be a good choice, do not jump on WIN 2000
>immediately,
>with windows 98 & 2000 you can use FAT32 = small cluster size (4K) = faser
>disk access,
>but overall NT is more reliable. Also, you can always upgrade.
>
>1. Order as much RAM, as you can (256MB or more)
>2. Order Fastest VideoCard, 16MB of Video Memory, EDO memory is slowest
>video memory
>3. Unless everything in your computer is SCSI, do not buy SCSI hard drive,
>IDE -fast DMA has a good access time.
> In case of SCSI - configure it as RAID 1 or 0+1 for data protection
>(needs double harddrive )
>4. Buy CD-Writer for the data backups ($1 for 600MB of backup space)
>5. You processor is as fast as the slowest component of your computer
>
>If you are not a hardware professional, make sure, that the warranty is
good
>
>Regards,
> Ron Warshawsky
>
>P.S. Look around, The above points is just a basics. Really good
performance
>can be achieved only through the
>system tunung and monitoring after the necesary software is installed and
>used. Get some Microsoft Certification
>material, it has a good information.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: BJÖRN BOLUMLID < bolum@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bolum@xxxxxxxxxx> >
>To: EQUIS MAIL-list < metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
><mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>Date: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 3:37 AM
>Subject: Avoid problem new PC
>
>
>
>Hallo
>
>In a attemt to avoid problem whit a new PC and get the best performance
>whit Metastock EOD 6.52 I will ask the list-members for some advice to get
>the best .
>
>* Win 98 , Win 2000 or NT ?
>* Workingmemory size ?
>* HD-type , IDE , SCSI or Wide SCSI ?
>* Graphic-card ?
>Or perhaps the question is , what NOT to use by Yours experience .
>
>
>I know it has been some discuss abaut performance and "virtual disc" , and
>also abaut "cache memory" , but I have miss the result abaut this .
>
>My attemt is to use Pentim III 450 or 500 Mhz processor .
>
>A´ good summer to all of you in the list .
>
>Björn Bolumlid
>Sweden
>
|