[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Off topic OmniTrader


  • To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: Off topic OmniTrader
  • From: George Ashton <golden1@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:14:11 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <01BEC162.3581B000@xxxx-247-101-216.ncal.verio.com>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Thanks, now if only I could get OT to read my MS data without locking up
and get Nirvana to respond to my e-mails!!!!!

George.

At 08:22 28/06/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>I've tested formats with 2 and 4 digit years (i.e. 00,2000).  Haven't had a 
>problem with either.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	George Ashton [SMTP:golden1@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent:	Sunday, June 27, 1999 10:35 PM
>To:	metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject:	RE: Off topic OmniTrader - Was Re: CCI Spike
>
>My data is still in the old format "AAA,990625,1.57,1.63,1.57,1.61,1459386"
>is yours y2k format??
>
>George.
>
>At 18:43 26/06/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>>I have no problems with OT 4.0 and MS 6.52
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From:	sayhow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [SMTP:sayhow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent:	Friday, June 25, 1999 6:47 PM
>>To:	metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject:	Re: Off topic OmniTrader - Was Re: CCI Spike
>>
>>
>>> OmniTrader not y2k compliant, is this for real?? I have just purchased a
>>> copy and 6 months out from y2k I would expect it to be.
>>> 
>>
>>Geogre,
>>
>>OT cannot read metastock's Y2K data.
>>
>>FOO
>>
>>
>>Foo Say How where when who why
>>Singapura - the Lion City
>>
>
>