[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cost of SuperCacheNT?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=241121919-22061999>Sorry 
David, I am outside the office and I hardly look at my emails right 
now,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
class=241121919-22061999></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
class=241121919-22061999>Supercache is arround 150$ for an unlimited cache size 
on NT workstation,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
class=241121919-22061999></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=241121919-22061999>It is 
much more expensive (around $1500 for a NT server single-processor unlimited 
cache size). In the later case I would recommand first get a RAID 0 with a write 
back cache of 128 K)</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman" 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
  owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On 
  Behalf Of</B> David McAdoo<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, June 20, 1999 8:51 
  AM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Cost of 
  SuperCacheNT?<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Hi Laurent,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Don't know if you saw my original post, but could you 
  answer a couple of questions please?</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial>How much did you have to pay for SuperCache NT?<BR>I 
  checked their web site, but they say prices vary for every 
  configuration.<BR><BR>And do you use NT Workstation or NT 
  Server?<BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Dave McAdoo<BR>Colorado Springs, 
  CO<BR>=================<BR></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Jun 22 17:20:26 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.4) with SMTP id 08231;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 20:11:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA06417
	for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:57:41 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA06414
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:57:38 -0600
Received: from basecamp1.netquest.net (netquest.net [204.140.219.1])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA08334
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:11:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from p400 (dsl0074.netquest.net [206.117.109.74]) by basecamp1.netquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id QAA16154 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Surprise turnaround
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:59:12 -0700
Message-ID: <000601bebd0b$39cd5340$4a6d75ce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
In-Reply-To: <004901bebd1b$dcb57a00$ebc2fdd0@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 42bdec5c52ebdb344f2ae8e68ae206e9.03

JimG

In the past, it's always fallen on me. <G>

Guy


-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Greening
Sent:	Tuesday, June 22, 1999 6:58 PM
To:	metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: Surprise turnaround

Guy,
     I'm a firm believer in riding the horse until it drops <G>.

JimG
----- Original Message -----
From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 1999 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: Surprise turnaround


> JimG
>
> We had already closed out 80% of our longs, but reinstated them
> substantially lower and we're back to 100% invested on the up side also.
So
> far, the market has been kind to us.  Now, that usually means a sharp
stick
> in the eye. <G>
>
> Anyway, we're just holding on for the ride and playing our system, which
> like baaseball, beeeen verrry verrry good to me. :)
>
> Regards
>
> Guy
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 1999 5:34 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Surprise turnaround
>
> Guy,
>      If you're getting comfortable and I'm going to be 100% invested long
> for the first time in some time, maybe we should both look out <G>.
>
> JimG
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 9:34 PM
> Subject: RE: Surprise turnaround
>
>
> > JimG
> >
> > We're still long and hanging on for the ride.  You know the market's
about
> > to crap out because I'm getting more comfortable with our long
positions.
> > That's always a great sign that the bottom will fall out shortly. :)
> >
> > For someone who always sees the 'dark side' (took my nine year old to
Star
> > Wars, Episode I), I have always had a problem working with these bull
> moves.
> > I've now come to term with the philosophy that says, "In a bull market,
> the
> > market will somehow find a way to take negative news and neutralize it,
> and
> > take neutral news and make it positive.  Positive news will take care of
> > itself."
> >
> > Of course, in a long term bear market, the opposite applies. :)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Guy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 4:12 PM
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Surprise turnaround
> >
> > Guy,
> >      Your buy signal was sure a great one.  The NASDAQ just closed up
over
> > 100 points.  Sure hope you had your long positions on.  Now my next
> question
> > is how long is this going to last <G>?  Sure hope it's not just a one
day
> > pop.
> >
> > JimG
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 11:17 PM
> > Subject: Surprise turnaround
> >
> >
> > > JimG
> > >
> > > Well, will wonders ever cease.  Our Intermediate Term Sell Signal just
> > > turned into an Intermediate Term Buy Signal.  Now, I'll a little
nervous
> > > here since we just changed months on our modified continuous S&P
> contract,
> > > but will go with it anyway.
> > >
> > > That ITSS showed a 8.70 point profit and brought up the profitability
of
> > > this signal, by itself to 89% for the last 13 months.  I guess this
> means
> > > that we're going to start back up, I hope. :-)
> > >
> > > Remember what it cost you.  That's probably what this advise is worth.
> <G>
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Guy
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>