RE: Sad Stochastic

["Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>]

Do you mean like the attached GIF!!!!

<<If you plot both and drag the custom over the
built-in, or vice versa, you will see they are the same plot, assuming
you are using the same %K value in both.>>

One is Mov( ( ( ( C - LLV( L,13 ) ) /( HHV( H,13 ) - LLV( L,13 ) ) ) * 100 )
,8 ,S );
for the other's values see Sad MS stoc Properties.gif.

I suggest you practice dragging unless you meant 'close enough for
government work'


Bob

bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Equis Support
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 9:43 AM
To: 'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Sad Stochastic


Bob,

I am not certain I totally understand what you want us to listen to. If
you are calling the custom stochastic we have in the program,
"Stochastic Example of hhv() function" the correct %K, then the built-in
%K is correct also. If you plot both and drag the custom over the
builtin, or vice versa, you will see they are the same plot, assuming
you are using the same %K value in both.

Please provide more information on what you feel is wrong and we'll look
deeper.


Equis Support

http://www.equis.com/
http://www.equis.com/customer/support/
Please include previous email answers and questions in your response.
Equis and MetaStock and MetaStock Professional are registered trademarks
of Equis International. Achelis Binary Wave, The DownLoader, Expert
Advisor, OptionScope, Quotecenter, and Smart Charts are trademarks of
Equis International.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Jagow [mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 6:09 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Sad Stochastic



Has anyone ever asked Equis to fix their stochastic oscillator?
 Their custom %K is correct but the builtin still uses the A to Z
description,
-----
"The above example used a %K Slowing Period of 1-day (no slowing). If
you use a value greater than
one, you average the highest-high and the lowest-low over the number of
%K Slowing Periods before
performing the division."
------
which is just plain wrong. Would be nice to get the correct #s.

Are you listening, Equis?
Bob
bjagow@xxxxxxx mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx




Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Bad MS builtin vs Good Custom Stoc.gif"

Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Sad MS stoc Properties.gif"