|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=273494508-12051999>I saw
also a lot of posts on hte Virus, but I believe that a lot of people were
actually the first.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=273494508-12051999>I sent
an email just as I discovered the virus, but I saw it appear in the list a
long time after I sent it (several hours).</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=273494508-12051999>All
this explains all those warnings at the same time.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of</B> WFN<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May 11, 1999 6:01 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
Metastock List<BR><B>Subject:</B> On All the Virus
Warnings<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>OK, everybody on the MetaStock list thinks they have
to send out a virus warning because of that Happy Exe.</FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>BUT I WAS FIRST so you don't have to send out anymore
warnings.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff> It's so crazy some folks aren't even
referencing the post with the virus, just sending out that YOU have the virus
and are spreading it. Now that's really gonna confuse people that don't
know anything about it (What'dya mean <STRONG><EM>I </EM></STRONG>got a
virus!?. Whass up wi' dat?) Or the ones that are computer
illiterates (<STRONG><EM><FONT size=4>I</FONT></EM></STRONG> got a
virus??!!. Oh no, now what am I gonna doooooo?? Why, send out more
e-mails asking for help in getting rid of something they don't even have,
thereby adding to the clutter). Not to mention the pathetically
uninformed that are going to click on it and infect themselves, then spread it
around some more. (Duh, hey look at them fireworks, man, ain't dat cool.
I like these better'n the graphics Harley used to send out!)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Just trying to make an attempt at humor as there's
going to be mass whining and moaning about too many e-mails on the list
tonight. May cooler heads prevail.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Good trading.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed May 12 08:03:06 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 23009;
Wed, 12 May 1999 06:00:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA31387
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 12 May 1999 18:06:06 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA31384
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 18:06:03 -0600
Received: from mail.apsydev.com (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [62.160.31.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA08994
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 03:57:33 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from lgt (lgt.apsydev.com [62.160.31.54])
by mail.apsydev.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA23592
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 11:46:52 +0200
From: "Laurent GITTLER" <lgittler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: KST
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:45:56 +0200
Message-ID: <000901be9c5c$3bcda610$361fa03e@xxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01BE9C6C.FF567610"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 2818865bd30ef1f653c3014669746df5.06
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2> A few weeks ago, I saw several posts about
Martin Pring KST time periods selection,<BR></FONT><FONT size=2><BR><FONT
face=Arial>I am trying to associate KST with others indicators, like the coppok
curve (thanks to Steve Karnish).</FONT></FONT></P><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT
color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>
<P>From a chat on www.equitytrader.com
I found Bollinger was using KST to detect sector rotation but giving more weight
to short term ROC rather than long term ROC, so applying the KST in a reverse
way from Pring recommandations (chat session transcript attached).</P>
<P>I was wondering if any of the list members tried to use KST in that way,
rather than PRING recommandations.</P>
<P>Also, I would like to know if anyone in the list has tried to do a weekly and
mohtly compute of KST based on a daily chart ?</FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2><FONT face=Arial>Laurent Gittler<BR></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2><FONT face=Arial> </P></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Bollinger0127.htm"
|