PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Okay, I now declare an end to this whole damn cockup. I will respond
privately to those to have requested info, and I would truly encourage an
exchange of ideas on the subject, but it might be wiser to keep the entire
future discussion private.
Jeez, ya' try to do something nice for people.
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred J. <fred.j@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: May 10, 1999 15:39
Subject: RE: Please do not send the recursive moving trendline to me
> Glen,
> Absolutely no silly flame intended.
> At least up to this time, it has been customary for a member to post his
> work simply to share it with other members (and at other times to benefit
> from other members work), or post it to solicit comments and improvements.
> Now, your method is not any of the above. Your formula (whatever it is)
> has not generated any healthy discussions, and my e-mail box is stuffed
> with all these requests from scholars.
> Fred
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Glen Wallace
> > Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 2:22 PM
> > To: MetaStock listserver
> > Subject: Re: Please do not send the recursive moving trendline to me
> >
> >
> > Fred:
> >
> > You've confused me. Is my offer to share my Recursive Moving
> > Trendline code
> > not the reciprocation you seem to expect? You might want to be more
> > specific.
> >
> > If you are referring to me suggesting people respond directly to
> > me, that is
> > simply my attempt to keep the listserver as clutter-free as possible.
On
> > the other hand, if you are referring to me not posting the code
> > directly to
> > the listserver, I posted the code for another system in February and the
> > listserver software stripped the attachments because of size
> > restrictions.
> > I ended up having to post it in three awkward segments. Now, if you are
> > just posting a silly flame, I'd be happy to respond but we
> > should probably
> > take the exchange private.
>
>
|