[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: StochRSI Parameter Set (Round 2)


  • To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: StochRSI Parameter Set (Round 2)
  • From: "Laurent GITTLER" <lgittler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:45:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • In-reply-to: <000c01be94d4$e7c6dde0$18782299@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>0 Nicholas Stationery</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY background="" bgColor=#fffbf0 
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffbf0; COLOR: #0000ff; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV><SPAN class=393462514-03051999>So, this is a slow StochRSI, Chande's one 
was a fast StochRSI. Anyway, as RSI is self-smoothing, I'm curious to see if EMA 
on StochRSI brings an additonal value.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=393462514-03051999></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=393462514-03051999>If you want to get an unsmoothed StochRSI 
like indicator, you can apply it to Chande CMO, thus giving StockCMO, just 
change RSI(mp1) by CMO(c,mp1) in formula.</SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman" 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
  owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On 
  Behalf Of</B> jrwolansky<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, May 02, 1999 9:50 
  PM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: StochRSI 
  Parameter Set (Round 2)<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
  <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The .0000001 is to avoid a "division by zero" 
  error from showing up in Metastock.</FONT></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
    <A href="mailto:nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx"; title=nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>Nicholas 
    Kormanik</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
    title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, May 02, 1999 12:48 
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> StochRSI Parameter Set (Round 
    2)</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>StochRSI, Round 2.....</SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>The formula I've adopted was put on the 
    Silicon Investor thread by 'bdog'.&nbsp; Basically I just leave the Slowing 
    Periods to 1, so it really plays no part in things.&nbsp; However, if 
    somebody presents a good argument for using other than 1, hey, I'm 
    amenable.</SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>Also, I don't know what the hell the 
    .0000001 is for, but it's so small that it doesn't appear to affect things 
    either.</SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>Chande, the original inventor, didn't 
    use the moving average on the whole thing.&nbsp; Chande's was sort of 
    choppy.&nbsp; I guess along the way people decided to thus add the EMA 
    Periods.</SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>Here's the MSWin formula:</SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>mp1:=Input("RSI Periods",1,377,13);<BR>mp2:=Input("Stoch 
    Periods",1,377,13);<BR>mp3:=Input("Slowing 
    Periods",1,377,1);<BR>mp4:=Input("EMA Periods",1,377,5);</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>Mov(Sum((RSI(mp1)-LLV(RSI(mp1),mp2)),mp3)/Sum((.0000001+(HHV(RSI(mp1),mp2)-(LLV(RSI(mp1),mp2)))),mp3),mp4,E)*100</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>Now, from posts, etc., the following 
    parameters *seem* to be the one's&nbsp;recommended.&nbsp; I'm trying to 
    further find consensus among users of StochRSI on what really appears to 
    work for them.</SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>
    <P>StochRSI Set <BR>-------------------- <BR>5 -- 5 -- 3 <BR>8 -- 8 -- 5 
    <BR>13 -- 13 -- 13 <BR>21 -- 15 -- 13 <BR>21 -- 21 -- 13 <BR>34 -- 34 -- 13 
    <BR>55 -- 55 -- 21 <BR>89 -- 13 -- 34 <BR>89 -- 89 -- 21 <BR>233 -- 233 -- 
    34</P>
    <P>&nbsp;</P>
    <P><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>Thanks,</SPAN></P>
    <P><SPAN class=250493517-02051999>Nicholas</SPAN></P>
    <P>&nbsp;</P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon May 03 08:46:44 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail07.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 3603093;
	Mon,  3 May 1999 11:31:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA21755
	for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 3 May 1999 23:32:34 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA21752
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 May 1999 23:32:32 -0600
Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02252
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 May 1999 09:23:15 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from micron ([12.73.224.45]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP
          id <19990503151051.DQBF10986@xxxxxx>
          for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 May 1999 15:10:51 +0000
Message-ID: <003001be9577$134fdb40$2de0490c@xxxxxx>
From: "Lionel  Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <199905030858.QAA20743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: non metastock question:looking for
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 09:48:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 38f95e98f99a71b44f9fbb281508a604.02

Reed:

the address has an error. Change vocaltel to vocaltec.

Lionel
----- Original Message -----
From: M & P Reed <toprunlb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 1999 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: non metastock question:looking for


> Mike
> I am in the process of installing the Vocaltel Communications system. I
> believe it has the capacity to do what you require. The  Home site adress
> is   www.vocaltel.com
> Good luck. Mark Reed
> ----------
> > From: michael arnoldi <marnoldi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: A METASTOCK GROUP <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: non metastock question:looking for
> > Date: Sunday, 2 May 1999 18:56
> >
> > a software that will let you make international/interstate phone calls
> > over the internet & recognized as a local phonecall
> > anyone know where to find this ?
> >
> > mike arnoldi