Re: Message to Guy. Thanks very much.

[BuyersG@xxxxxxx]

Thanks very much Guy.. that sounds really interesting.  I, and probably most 
here, appreciate that bit of expounding very much.  Sorry for sounding 
critical about vagueness.. that really was not the right word.  It was just 
my own extreme curiousity... my math & physics background kicking in :)      
AND
Sorry group, I have not been around long enough nor contributed enough to 
make requests of busy people.  Please do not start a flaming sequence. 
Consider 
me as learning appropriate thread decorum fast.  Let's  just help each
other make more money and stick to the topic. I will be more careful with 
words. 
  Guy,  I especially like the parts about dropping gapping and using more 
RECENT
activity as input.  Sounds pretty logical. Actually reviewing and refreshing  
our old complex best accomplishments CAN be a rewarding experience.  But,  
really,   thanks for what you told us... and any tidbit more  <g>...
well I hope you dont go out of your way. Out of the BILLIONS of combinations
of  indicators applied to various data... most of which  DONT work 
exceptionally well..  it is just enlightening to have ANY idea of what 
reflects factors & methods
 that DO work.  SO many thousands of man-hours are going into systems that 
just seem to work temporarily.  That is another reason why a system more 
heavily based on more current data makes sense to me.    
Thanks again..  we really appreciate it.  It sounds  FASCINATING.  Yes those
old computers are hard to get going again..Previous Norton Utilities helped me
to do a rewrite disk data in place on one to restore the magnetic signal 
strength for
processing.  Yes  DOS sure did run faster than WIN98.. I bet that screams 
fast on 
a new 350Meg hz .   Sincere thanks  once again.

In a message dated 4/28/99 4:27:13 PM Central Daylight Time, grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
writes:

<< I did post a whole bunch of generalities and the philosophy behind our
 methodology a while back, probably at least a couple of years or so.  I'll
 try to resurrect it.  Hopefully it wasn't on that old computer that died.
 
 Actually, just going through the methodology helped me to remember what
 we're doing. ...----(other comments and explanation not recopied to save 
space)>>