|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1700"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=320575801-23021999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Congrats</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=320575801-23021999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=320575801-23021999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Being
the proverbial bear, I'm constantly amazed when my longs continue to make money
at these levels. Can't quite believe the move today, but it's better than
a sharp stick in the eye. :)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=320575801-23021999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=320575801-23021999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Guy</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=320575801-23021999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On Behalf Of</B> Jim
Greening<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 22, 1999 7:49 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
Metastock<BR><B>Subject:</B> AOL, CSCO, & WMT<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> Not a bad day
<G>. I wasn't surprised when my buy stop for CSCO was hit at 98 5/8,
but I was definitely surprised when my buy stop on AOL was hit at 165 1/8.
That was 5 points above Friday's close so I didn't even send the AOL chart out
Saturday. Then it went on and gained another 8 points after it hit my buy
stop. Talk about momentum! </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> HD didn't hit my buy
stop, but WMT barely closed at a new all time high. Therefore, I'm going
to cancel my GTC buy stop on HD and buy WMT in the morning
instead. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>JimG </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Feb 22 21:06:43 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 17129
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:48:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA12677
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:22:21 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12673
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:22:18 -0700
Received: from basecamp1.netquest.net (netquest.net [204.140.219.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA12335
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 19:18:52 -0700 (MST)
Received: from p400.netquest.net (dsl0074.netquest.net [206.117.109.74]) by basecamp1.netquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id SAA19115 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:07:19 -0800 (PST)
From: "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:06:22 -0800
Message-ID: <001601be5ed1$1c41c240$4a6d75ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
In-Reply-To: <24FA77225FA5D111869F0000C025B6F26A6BBC@xxxxxxx>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: d9d692840663aa479d50f88bf402a0fa.1c
Equis
I ran MS 4.5 today for the first time against the results of the Downloader
6.52 update and all worked fine. since I don't use any of your indicators
or experts and just process my own indicators, I'll be a happy camper as
long as it keeps the data in the proper sequence.
I'm still going to try and convert my stuff one last time before just
relegating MS to a charting program and using Visual Basic or whatever to
run my system.
Regards
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Equis Support
Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 12:00 PM
To: 'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
MetaStock for Dos may run after January 1, 2000. However, there have
not been and will not be any code changes made to make indicators, etc.
work past December 31, 1999. We will not support the product after
December 31, 1999 either.
If you continue to use any MetaStock version prior to version 6.52 of
MetaStock for Windows 95/NT or MetaStock Professional, we will not
provide support nor will we make any warranty regarding the results of
any calculations.
Equis Support
http://www.equis.com/
http://www.equis.com/customer/support/
Please include previous email answers and questions in your response.
Equis and MetaStock and MetaStock Professional are registered trademarks
of Equis International. Achelis Binary Wave, The DownLoader, Expert
Advisor, OptionScope, Quotecenter, and Smart Charts are trademarks of
Equis International.
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Tann [mailto:grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 10:38 AM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
As far as I know, there are no plans to make Y2K compliant data bases
available to MS for DOD. I have updated DL with the latest patch which
supposedly makes it Y2K compatible, so I need to run a test using MS for
DOS
with the new data and see if it works.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lian PL
Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 12:22 AM
To: Guy Tann
Cc: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
I am interested in the Y2K code for DOS too. If you don't mind, I should
be pleased to know the solution too.
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Guy Tann wrote:
> Lionel
>
> I sent you a private e-mail because I was babbling on.
>
> Regards
>
> Guy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lionel and Gail
Issen
> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 1999 4:14 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
>
>
> Guy:
> Will you sell or post your VB code?
>
> Lionel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, February 20, 1999 12:36 AM
> Subject: RE: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
>
>
> >Arun
> >
> >I only wish they had Y2K support for v4.5 MS DOS. Even though I have
all
> of
> >the newer versions. I'm going to try to get my stuff running under
6.52
> but
> >it never ran under 6.0 so I don't have high hopes. I actually ran
the
> >automated conversion moving over to MS for Windows and my stuff
didn't
> >execute well. The DOS version runs at least 30 times faster than the
WIN
> >version, not counting the disk thrashing. I'm going to rekey
everything
> >from scratch and see if this helps. If not, I'm moving everything
over
to
> >Visual Basic and quit screwing around with MS except to use for
charting.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Guy
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Arun Verma
> >Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 9:28 PM
> >To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Though I have all versions of Metastock, my preferred TA software
> >is still Metastock for DOS. There are many many users like me
> >around the world who still prefer to use Metastock for DOS, simply
> >because they are used to it and have used it for donkey years.
> >
> >Has Equis got any Y2K solution for them also????.
> >
> >
> >Arun Verma
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|