[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Different moving averages.



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Michel,
     Actually I never used simple moving averages.  I started out using
exponential then changed to variable.  I still use variable moving averages
in some of my Metastock system tests.

JimG

-----Original Message-----
From: Michel Dussault <mdussault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, January 29, 1999 4:07 AM
Subject: Different moving averages.


>Jim, Guy & all,
>
>Thanks for sharing your observations on preferred MA.
>What do you think about using the exponential MA (The method used to
>calculate an exponential moving average puts more weight toward recent
>data and less weight toward past data than does the simple moving
>average method.  This method is often called exponentially weighted.)
>vs using the Simple MA.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>In the past, we've found that 14 day and 50 day moving averages
>worked best
>>with a lot of our indicators.
>
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Behalf Of Jim Greening
>
>
>>>      As just about everybody knows by now, I use trend channels for
>that
>>> <G>.  In the past I also used moving averages, buying on crossovers
>of the
>>> 21 day moving average as long as the crossover was in the direction
>of the
>>> 55 day moving average.
>
>
>