|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=Windows-1252 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content='"MSHTML 5.00.0910.1309"' name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>As your mail makes much sence, then anyone replying<BR>to Equis Support's
request on "Advancing the System Tester"<BR>be also noted that</DIV>
<DIV> <STRONG>any suggestions mails should first be send
to</STRONG><BR>
suggestions@xxxxxxxxx</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>with "System Tester Suggestions" in
the subject line !</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>And second perhaps also to the List, so as for others to
see.<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas<BR><A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxx</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>----- Original
Message -----<BR>From: Don Hughes <<A
href="mailto:daringdon@xxxxxxxxxxx";>daringdon@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Sent:
woensdag 20 januari 1999 2:16<BR>Subject: Re: MetaStock System Testing
capabilities<BR><BR><BR>>One main suggestion, which you'll probably get from
everyone, handle multiple stocks, not one stock at a time.
Almost<BR>everyone today are using computers that are much faster than when the
System Tester was designed, and can handle<BR>multiple stock testing now, when
they might not have then.<BR>><BR>>Don<BR>><BR>>*********** REPLY
SEPARATOR ***********<BR>><BR>>On 1/19/99, at 9:43 AM, Equis Support
wrote:<BR>><BR>>>In the interest of improving the system
testing<BR>>>capabilities in MetaStock, we are asking for your
input. We have many<BR>>>suggestions which we are currently
evaluating, but would like as much<BR>>>feedback as possible. So
please send us your opinions on what you would<BR>>>like the System Tester
to have or do or what you wouldn't like it to<BR>>>have or do.
Please be as detailed as possible.<BR>>><BR>>> We will evaluate all
the suggestions we receive<BR>>>and see if we can incorporate them into
future versions. Please<BR>>>understand that not every suggestion
can be used. However, we feel it<BR>>>is important for us to receive
all types of comments.<BR>>><BR>>> Please send all suggestions
to<BR>>><A
href="mailto:suggestions@xxxxxxxxx";>mailto:suggestions@xxxxxxxxx</A> with
"System Tester Suggestions" in the<BR>>>subject
line.<BR>>><BR>>> Thanks for your help!<BR>>><BR>>>
Allan McNichol<BR>>> Equis International,
Inc<BR>><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jan 20 14:32:04 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 1075
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:14:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA23144
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 14:42:18 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA23140
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 14:42:16 -0700
Received: from mail-gw5.pacbell.net (mail-gw5.pacbell.net [206.13.28.23])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA02287
for <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 14:50:21 -0700 (MST)
Received: from p400 (ppp-207-215-161-30.grdn01.pacbell.net [207.215.161.30]) by mail-gw5.pacbell.net (8.8.8/8.7.1+antispam) with SMTP id NAA00224; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:37:45 -0800 (PST)
From: "Guy Tann" <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock User Group" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jim Greening" <jimginva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: short term short
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:38:30 -0800
Message-ID: <000101be44bd$38dbf700$1ea1d7cf@xxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: f80b3784ad34caa4efb669660a63d7f2
Jim G.
FWIW, we went short last night (S&P @ 1265.50). This is our first short
since 10/1/98.
Our longer term trend is still up so I only took a half position in this
trade (coward that I am :)). This longer term signal does real well, but
doesn't call the tops and bottoms as well as the short term signal we traded
last night (actually 1/6/99 signal date).
After watching the ticker for a while (and being way behind I might add) I
had to take off for a doctor's appointment (where they sucked out my blood
again). I'm thinking of installing a tap on one of my arteries just to make
it easier.
Anyway, that's all from here. We're still awaiting the reversal in our long
term signal to really go short. This short term signal went short
originally @1280.20 at the close on 1/6/99. We didn't trade that one
because our long term signal was still up (from 10/1/98 @994.80).
Haven't looked up where the market closed (March futures), so I have no idea
if this trade is in the black or red as I write this.
Regards
Guy
|