|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Is a way around this a CABLE
modem????</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>John Sellers <<A
href="mailto:ay286@xxxxxxxx";>ay286@xxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To: </B>Metastock
User Group <<A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Monday, January 18, 1999 4:51 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Future Cost Impact
of Internet Usage<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV>
<DIV>There is a new bill in US Congress that will be affecting all Internet
Users. <BR>You might want to read this and pass it.<BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>CNN stated that the Government would in two weeks time decide to allow
or not allow a Charge to your (OUR) phone bill<BR>equal to a long distance
call each time you access the internet. This will be very costly for
those of us who like to "surf the net"<BR>and communicate
frequently via emails. Think about that for a minute, and how it would
effect each and<BR>everyone of us. Please visit the following URL and
fill out the necessary form to contact your Representative regarding this
matter. The address is<BR><A
href="http://www.house.gov/writerep/";>http://www.house.gov/writerep/</A>
If EACH one of us, forward this message on to others in a hurry, we may be
able to prevent this injustice from happening!<BR><BR></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=4>John
Sellers<BR>Torrance, CA<BR>USA</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Jan 19 06:15:29 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 17858
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:37:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA12910
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:55:54 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA12907
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:55:51 -0700
Received: from relay14.jaring.my (relay14.jaring.my [192.228.128.125])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA27978
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:13:50 -0700 (MST)
Received: from campton (j23.dms35.jaring.my [161.142.181.157])
by relay14.jaring.my (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA03790
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:02:36 +0800 (MYT)
Message-Id: <Version.32.19990119085318.00fa8e40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: campton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:54:19 +0800
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joe Campton <campton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Investor sentiment - neutral
In-Reply-To: <199901180555.AAA13849@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 972d1a68c0e17762b77c189f6a9124b5
I am getting 2 copies of your survey. 1 is plenty.
At 10:22 PM 17/01/99 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>----------------------------------------------
>
> LOWRISK.COM
>
> INVESTOR SENTIMENT SURVEY
>
> 1 / 18 / 99
>
>
> brought to you by Investormap.com
>the biggest directory of investing sites on the net.
> http://www.investormap.com
>
>------------------------------------------------
>
>Below are the results of our weekly "Guess the Dow" sentiment survey. The
>survey was taken from 1/11 through 1/17 on our web site.
>
>Number of participants: 435
>
>30 day outlook:
>
>43% bullish, 54% last week
>23% bearish, 30% last week
>34% neutral, 17% last week
>
>(percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding)
>
>Median guess for the DJIA closing value on Friday, 1/22: 9499 (it was 9350
>last week). More complete sentiment data is available at
><http://www.lowrisk.com/sentiment.htm> .
>
>Bullish and bearish sentiment both declined dramatically last week. Bullish
>sentiment fell 11% to 43%, while bearish sentiment dropped 7% to 23%. The
>neutral camp was the big gainer, doubling from 17% to 34%. This makes the
>coming week very tough to read on a sentiment front. However, we have noticed
>a loose correlation between high neutral readings (we consider
>greater than 30% neutral sentiment as a high reading) and future market
>volatility.
>
>Please stop by to take part in this weeks survey at:
>http://www.lowrisk.com/guess.htm
>More sentiment data is at: http://www.lowrisk.com/sentiment.htm
>
>best regards,
>Jeff Walker
>
>-----------------------------
>To subscribe: send mailto:wml-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>"subscribe" in the body of the message.
>
>To unsubscribe: send mailto:wml-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>"unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
>-----------------------------------
>
>
>jwalker@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>InvestorMap.com - THE financial and investing directory -
>http://investormap.com
>Lowrisk.com - making sense of the market - http://www.lowrisk.com
>
|