[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Subject: RE: MS 6.5 - Y2K ?


  • To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Subject: RE: MS 6.5 - Y2K ?
  • From: "Alton Stephens" <astephen@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 23:49:55 -0500 (EST)
  • In-reply-to: <4.1.19981231000826.009e6100(null)>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Alain, good points.  I am more irritated by Equis' attitude than the others,
so it may well be that my prejudice is showing thru.


Al Stephens
astephen@xxxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Alain JOSSART
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 1998 6:18 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Subject: RE: MS 6.5 - Y2K ?
>
>
>
> >
> > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 20:28:30 -0500
> > From: "Alton Stephens" <astephen@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > who cares about the read version?  How about the write version?
>  you guys
> > are gonna get creamed with your proprietary silliness, just like Apple.
> >
> > Al Stephens
> > astephen@xxxxxxxx
>
>
> Al,
>
> I will issue the same kind of remark as already made
> on the Quote Plus (One) e-mail list.
> Neither Quote Plus nor Worden Bros did offer me or
> any competitor a write version of their API.
>
> Why is nobody shooting at them ?
>
> As an European, let me add that neither of them is
> proposing any solution to create custom markets
> either, while Equis does.
>
> "Open" ?????
>
> -- Alain
>