|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><HTML>
Stan,
<P>Just for the record, I use Netscape Communicator 4. Here's what
the heading looks like on all posts I recieve from the Metastock list:
<P>Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
<BR> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:13:35 -0500
<BR> From: <U><FONT COLOR="#3366FF">"Stan Rubenstein"
<stansan@xxxxxxx></FONT></U>
<BR>Reply-To: <U><FONT COLOR="#3333FF">metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></U>
<BR> To: <U><FONT COLOR="#3333FF"><metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT></U>
<P>The following elements are underscored, and in blue:
<BR> "Stan Rubenstein"
<stansan@xxxxxxx>
<BR> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR> <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<P>The ONLY way I can respond to "Stan Rubenstein" is to <B><I>manually</I></B>
enter that email address into a new message. Selecting "respond to
author" or "respond to all" both direct my post back to the list.
<P>The situation on the RT list is different. Here's a heading from
RT:
<P>Subject: Gen: Opens are the most critical part of the day.
<BR> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 21:18:38 -0700
<BR> From: <U><FONT COLOR="#3333FF">"Brent.........." <........@xxxxxxxx></FONT></U>
<BR> To: <U><FONT COLOR="#3333FF">RealTraders
Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT></U>
<P>"Brent......" and "RealTraders....." are underscored and in blue.
<P>On the RT list, if I select "reply to author" the post is directed only
to Brent. If I select "reply to all" the message goes to Brent AND
to the list.
<P>Isn't there a way that the owner of the metastock list could change
this? It might even facilitate communication between people who would
profit from discussing certain matters in public, but would do better discussing
other things "one-on-one." (Such as "Thanks, Paul."; "Good call,
Mike."; "Knock'em dead, Ralph."; or simply "Me too!" Sorry,
couldn't resist.)
<P>Philip
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P>the heading of
<BR>
<P>Rubenstein wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>THIS NOTE FOR STEVE KARNISH ONLY
<BR>PLEASE DELETE IMMEDIATELY
<BR>(explanation for sending to RT list given below)
<P>Steve you're right. Also on further investigation I
<BR>find that hitting the Reply to Author pulls up the
<BR>metastock @ ms...com which is the list server.
<BR>But your note does not bear your origination
<BR>e-mail address so even if I wanted to reply to
<BR>just you, I can't.
<BR>But your note also prompted me to find out
<BR>that hitting Reply to All doubles the listserver
<BR>address, and now I understand why some notes
<BR>arrive in duplicate, or in the case of CMA
<BR>(author hidden) quadruplicate.
<BR>Thanks again for clueing me in.
<BR>Sorry for bending the eyes of the RT list but
<BR>there was no other way to reply to just you.
<BR>Stan
<P>----------
<BR>> From: Steve Karnish <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
<BR>> Date: Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:19 PM
<BR>>
<BR>> Thank you Stan. I just hit "reply to author" and I got:
<BR>> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> Apparently, replying properly is not as easy as it seems (just like
<BR>> trading). For those of you looking for "one button" solutions...beware.
<BR>>
<BR>> Steve Karnish
<BR>> CCT
<BR>>
<BR>> ----------
<BR>> > From: Stan Rubenstein <stansan@xxxxxxx>
<BR>> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> > Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
<BR>> > Date: Thursday, November 19, 1998 7:40 AM
<BR>> >
<BR>> > I use IE 3.02 and MS Outlook 97. When I open an RT note
<BR>> > I see three icons on top of my screen; Reply to Author,
<BR>> > Reply to All,and Forward. It is simple to hit the first button
<BR>> > with a Thank You and not annoy the rest of the list.
<BR>> > FYI
<BR>> > Stan R.
<BR>> >
<BR>> > ----------
<BR>> > > From: Barry Spreen <bspreen@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> > > Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
<BR>> > > Date: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 11:15 PM
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > > It might be helpful if everyone included a mailto: in their Sig
file.
<BR>> > > That way it becomes easy to respond directly to the writer and
<BR>> > > bypassing the list.
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > > --
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > > Best
<BR>> > > Barry
<BR>> > > mailto:bspreen@xxxxxxxx
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > ></BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Nov 26 01:10:35 1998
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0) with SMTP id 14527
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 15:48:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA04654
for metastock-outgoing; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:53:02 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA04651
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:52:59 -0700
Received: from mailman.equis.com (mailman.equis.com [204.246.137.6])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA14461
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 13:08:53 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mailman.equis.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
id <XDT2F0CS>; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:50:04 -0700
Message-ID: <24FA77225FA5D111869F0000C025B6F2468868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Equis Support <support@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Clutter - maybe we can change the list
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:50:03 -0700
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: a7c9e5c53b0ca07ed83c6ec7d71ded05
I can certainly change the Reply To on this list. However, most of the
people who have been on the list for any length of time will remember
list members complaining that they would reply to a post and it would
not be posted to the list. That is because they selected Reply To and
the only address the message was sent to was the author. The list never
received a copy. We were asked to remedy that and did.
The same group of people will also remember that when someone did do a
Reply To All, the recipient received the personal message and a message
from the list. Duplicate messages basically. We were asked to remedy
that and we did.
If I remove the Reply To inserting the list address, everyone on the
list will need to remember to do a Reply to All, or messages meant for
the list will only go to the original author.
This decision is not ours. If the list members want the Reply To changed
to use the original authors email address, I will make that change. I
suggest that one member of the list seek by a personal email vote of
members the members choice and then let us know which Reply To choice
the membership wants.
Equis Support
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Schmitz [mailto:pschmi02@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 1998 11:01 AM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Clutter - maybe we can change the list
Stan,
Just for the record, I use Netscape Communicator 4. Here's what the
heading looks like on all posts I recieve from the Metastock list:
Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:13:35 -0500
From: Stan Rubenstein stansan@xxxxxxx
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The following elements are underscored, and in blue:
Stan Rubenstein stansan@xxxxxxx
metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The ONLY way I can respond to Stan Rubenstein is to manually enter that
email address into a new message. Selecting respond to author or respond
to all both direct my post back to the list.
The situation on the RT list is different. Here's a heading from RT:
Subject: Gen: Opens are the most critical part of the day.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 21:18:38 -0700
From: Brent.......... ........@xxxxxxxx
To: RealTraders Discussion Group realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brent...... and RealTraders..... are underscored and in blue.
On the RT list, if I select reply to author the post is directed only to
Brent. If I select reply to all the message goes to Brent AND to the
list.
Isn't there a way that the owner of the metastock list could change
this? It might even facilitate communication between people who would
profit from discussing certain matters in public, but would do better
discussing other things one-on-one. (Such as Thanks, Paul.; Good call,
Mike.; Knock'em dead, Ralph.; or simply Me too! Sorry, couldn't resist.)
Philip
the heading of
Rubenstein wrote:
THIS NOTE FOR STEVE KARNISH ONLY
PLEASE DELETE IMMEDIATELY
(explanation for sending to RT list given below)
Steve you're right. Also on further investigation I
find that hitting the Reply to Author pulls up the
metastock @ ms...com which is the list server.
But your note does not bear your origination
e-mail address so even if I wanted to reply to
just you, I can't.
But your note also prompted me to find out
that hitting Reply to All doubles the listserver
address, and now I understand why some notes
arrive in duplicate, or in the case of CMA
(author hidden) quadruplicate.
Thanks again for clueing me in.
Sorry for bending the eyes of the RT list but
there was no other way to reply to just you.
Stan
----------
From: Steve Karnish kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
Date: Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:19 PM
Thank you Stan. I just hit reply to author and I got:
metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Apparently, replying properly is not as easy as it seems (just like
trading). For those of you looking for one button solutions...beware.
Steve Karnish
CCT
----------
From: Stan Rubenstein stansan@xxxxxxx
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
Date: Thursday, November 19, 1998 7:40 AM
I use IE 3.02 and MS Outlook 97. When I open an RT note
I see three icons on top of my screen; Reply to Author,
Reply to All,and Forward. It is simple to hit the first button
with a Thank You and not annoy the rest of the list.
FYI
Stan R.
----------
From: Barry Spreen bspreen@xxxxxxxx
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clutter on the list
Date: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 11:15 PM
It might be helpful if everyone included a mailto: in their Sig file.
That way it becomes easy to respond directly to the writer and
bypassing the list.
--
Best
Barry
mailto:bspreen@xxxxxxxx
|