[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Telescan, a new level of incompetence



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I've been with telescan for over 2 years and I 
have the same problem with downloaded data. Full of errors everyday and always 
missing many tickers. Is there a better source out there? A recommendation would 
be greatly appreciated. What is frustrating is opening a chart and seeing 
unbelievably wide daily trading ranges many days back.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From: 
    </B>Bill Saxon &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: 
    </B>Metastock, EMail List &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;; 
    Fasttrack, EMail &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date: 
    </B>Monday, November 02, 1998 10:13 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Telescan, a new 
    level of incompetence<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>If there are any other poor fools out there 
    are still using Telescan I am curious if you are having the same problem I 
    am.&nbsp; They have gone from delivering faulty data to, in addition,&nbsp; 
    delivering no data on selected stocks, i.e. they don't recognize the 
    symbols.&nbsp; I had forty one in tonight's download.&nbsp; I refuse to 
    believe all these companies went out of business or changed their 
    symbol.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I had the same problem Friday and tried 
    again Sunday to reload.&nbsp; For some reason I thought they may be trying 
    to fix the problem.&nbsp; All to no avail.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Come the end of the month I am out of there.&nbsp; I don't 
    want to be the last man standing.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill Saxon<BR><A 
    href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> 
    </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Nov 02 21:17:15 1998
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 2203
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue,  3 Nov 1998 00:10:49 -0400 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA25160
	for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:18:42 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA25157
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:18:39 -0700
Received: from mail-gw3.pacbell.net (mail-gw3.pacbell.net [206.13.28.55])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA26082
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:32:44 -0700 (MST)
Received: from p400 (ppp-207-215-160-244.grdn01.pacbell.net [207.215.160.244]) by mail-gw3.pacbell.net (8.8.8/8.7.1+antispam) with SMTP id UAA09379 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 20:23:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "Guy Tann" <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Telescan, a new level of incompetence
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 20:23:00 -0800
Message-ID: <000d01be06e1$a3ffa140$f4a0d7cf@xxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01BE069E.95DC6140"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0
In-Reply-To: <000901be06ce$328ec6c0$abf6c5d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: b2605e4b117d1036920465f2ff4cab1a

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=320221004-03111998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>I 
tried Prophet Data and they had other problems.&nbsp; When I checked with Equis 
support, they told me it was a known Telescan problem, so I guess that means 
that Prophet is repping Telescan (but I'm not sure).&nbsp; Anyway, I dropped 
them this month.&nbsp; Only worked every other day &lt;g&gt;.&nbsp; Seems they 
had a problem when you just requested the current day's prices and forgot to 
send an end of message symbol.&nbsp; I trade futures.&nbsp; I understand that if 
you use their software it works (according to Steve K.) but I just gave 
up.&nbsp; Found an error in TBonds the first day and their S&amp;P Continuous 
was totally wrong.&nbsp; Got them to fix the S&amp;P problem 
though.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=320221004-03111998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
    <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman" 
    size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
    owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On 
    Behalf Of</B> Bill Saxon<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, November 02, 1998 6:04 
    PM<BR><B>To:</B> Metastock, EMail List; Fasttrack, EMail <BR><B>Subject:</B> 
    Telescan, a new level of incompetence<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>If there are any other poor fools out there 
    are still using Telescan I am curious if you are having the same problem I 
    am.&nbsp; They have gone from delivering faulty data to, in addition,&nbsp; 
    delivering no data on selected stocks, i.e. they don't recognize the 
    symbols.&nbsp; I had forty one in tonight's download.&nbsp; I refuse to 
    believe all these companies went out of business or changed their 
    symbol.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I had the same problem Friday and tried 
    again Sunday to reload.&nbsp; For some reason I thought they may be trying 
    to fix the problem.&nbsp; All to no avail.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Come the end of the month I am out of there.&nbsp; I don't 
    want to be the last man standing.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill Saxon<BR><A 
    href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> 
</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Nov 03 04:10:48 1998
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 18729
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue,  3 Nov 1998 00:34:55 -0400 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA25811
	for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:48:44 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA25808
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:48:41 -0700
Received: from ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com (siteadm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.3.128.66])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA26127
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 22:02:46 -0700 (MST)
Received: from home.com ([24.2.81.68]) by ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com
          (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with ESMTP id AAA17463
          for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 20:34:54 -0800
Message-ID: <363E8782.BA1A76C@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 23:33:06 -0500
From: "Ronald J. Russell, Jr." <ronrussell@xxxxxxxx>
Organization: @Home Network
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en]C-AtHome0404  (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Telescan, a new level of incompetence
References: <000901be06ce$328ec6c0$abf6c5d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 3b9763214b4d8c76a3a9e49f1dfdd7c7

Bill,
I gave up on Telescan well over a year ago for all the reasons you
listed plus
repeated overcharges and charges for services I never used billed to my
credit card.  I had to fight like hell to getmy money back.  In the end
their own records which I printed out from account management
menu proved I was right.

It is too bad because they could have a very good product if they only
gave
a damn about quality and thier customers.

Ron

> Bill Saxon wrote:
> 
> If there are any other poor fools out there are still using Telescan I
> am curious if you are having the same problem I am.  They have gone
> from delivering faulty data to, in addition,  delivering no data on
> selected stocks, i.e. they don't recognize the symbols.  I had forty
> one in tonight's download.  I refuse to believe all these companies
> went out of business or changed their symbol.
> 
> I had the same problem Friday and tried again Sunday to reload.  For
> some reason I thought they may be trying to fix the problem.  All to
> no avail.
> 
> Come the end of the month I am out of there.  I don't want to be the
> last man standing.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bill Saxon
> bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx