|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
1. Since you are able to set the mouse to a certain numerique sensitifity, I presume
you are doing this from the Power Tools "Teak UI" program.
In that program you have only one TAB for the mouse's configuration, and on this TAB
you are able to adjust the "Mouse Menu speed".
Here this speed is set to 3 1/4 (out of 0-10). The sensitifity is set 2 for double click
and 2 for dragging.
Note that there is also your Win95 Mouse settings as configuration in the Control Panel
to be set correctly.
Here this is set on the Buttons TAB to Slow for double clicking and on the Moving TAB
to Slow for the mousepointer speed with the other moving reflection being unabled.
2. Try un-installing and then re-installing the mouse again, but let Win95
detect it or use the " mouse.inf " file from your mouse manufacturers hardware
install disk.
On forehand, for safety reasons, make notes of the setup configuration given in
"Control Panel" | "Sytem" | "Device Control" and click the device Com port + TABs for
the mouse ports configuration and as device the Mouse's properties TAB itself too.
There might have been a change made as to what type of mouse is to be used
(here "serial", but -Win95 by itself- changed this at one stage to "standard" and
this then returned the mouse to give "greenspans irrational behaviour").
3. Also compare the mouse configuration setup(s) in the "Win.ini" and or "Sys.ini" files
with any of your older, previously saved "inis"(all are located in folder "C:\Windows"
with the older version having a "number" instead of "ini" or are named "win.bak"
and "sys.bak").
4. Check out http://support.microsoft.com for articles on + with the mouse as subject
5. And a call made to Cleansweeps makers-manufacturers helpdesk could also salve
this, as a final last resort
Quarterdeck
http://www.qdeck.com/
Quarterdeck Corporation
13160 Mindanao Way FL 3
Marina del Rey, CA 90292-9705
USA
(310) 309-3700 (Sales)
(310) 309-4250 (Technical Support)
General Notes
CleanSweep will not permit you to delete files that are currently in use.
On a network, Windows 95 permits you to attach to and access drives at
any time. CleanSweep will recognize only those drives to which you were
attached before you start the program.
The network decoy feature will not run if a copy of CleanSweep is
already running.
CleanSweep's Installation Monitor may have difficulty logging the
installation of the Microsoft Plus Pack and other system-level
software that reboots the machine before the installation process
is complete. Such software does not install itself in the same
way that applications do. We recommend extra care in uninstalling
these packages.
Regards,
Ton Maas
Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx
================================================
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Ken <divenfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Aan: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: dinsdag 20 oktober 1998 4:26
Onderwerp: OffTopic- MicroS. explorer slowdown
>I have an off topic kind of situation here and I would
>appreciate some help.
>I used CleanSweep Deluxe to uninstall a program. Immediately
>I noticed that when I scrolled thru folders on the right side
>of Microsoft explorer, there was a very definite lag time that
>wasn't there before. Same story when I open subdirectories.
>S-L-O-W. Very irritating. My only guess is that Cleansweep
>took some DLLs and files linked to explorer and who knows what
>other apps, but I don't know much about that kind of thing so
>as I say I'm just guessing. To give you an idea of the speed
>and effect, if you were to go into the control panel and put
>the mouse pointer trail speed to about #4, my file movement
>responds much the same way..slow and somewhat blurry. I
>decided to reinstall the program from the backup that
>CleanSweep made in hopes that it would restore everything that
>it had undone, and at least I would get rid of the lag.
>Didn't get rid of the lag. What are the chances that
>reinstalling Win95 would fix this? I'm looking for an easy
>fix if possible. Any help will be greatly appreciated, either
>posted to this list or privately.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Ken
|