[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Proven Correct" indicators



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

There is no such thing as always. But a level of success that you accept is
proven to you. you want a indicator that will let profits ride in a trend,
take profits at the end or sell quickly if price backs up.

Richard Estes


-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Bender <fbender@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: "Proven Correct" indicators


>Gary,
>My two cents:
>I don't think there is such a thing a "proven correct" indicator, if that
>phrase means an
>indicator that is correct ALWAYS.  Each one works well under certain
limited
>market
>conditons.  I think the trick to building an indicator-based system is to
ask
>key questions of the market, eg. what is the trend? what is the quality of
the
>trend?, are we in a pullback?, etc. by selecting an indicator designed to
>answer just one question.  The final trading decision then depends on the
>traders' judgment, based on the answers the indicators reveal.  Possibly,
the
>answers each indicator reveals can be programmed, i.e. in a binary wave and
>then in a system.
>Best wishes,
>Fred Bender
>
>Randall_Gary@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Walter Lake mentioned "Proven Correct" indicators in his recent post on
>> Trade management indicators.  There was also a discussion on this a while
>> ago.  I like the Phantom of the Pits thoughts on this, especially in
terms
>> of volume, but have not come up with anything I'd want to bet much money
>> on.
>>
>> Does anyone have any more thoughts on this?
>>
>> Gary Randall -- Brunswick, Maine
>
>
>
>