|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Mentor/Friend/Teacher views :
On Sunday I sent him this site address asking him to compare his count :
Extracts of his reply:
Sept 21, 1998
Have just been analysing the charts on www.wavechart.com/wavlong.htm
1. Chart updated on Aug 3, 1998
Uptill A-B-C-X it is OK. The next A-B-C (A) followed by irregular
A-B-C (B) does not make sense. The (A) is a 3-wave movement and
hence it has to be retraced more than 61.8% by (B).
A better count would be A-B-C-X-A-B-C-X-A (completed so far). The
completed count could be A-B-C-X-A-B-C-X-A-B-C which is a triple
zig-zag or it could be A-B-C-X-A-B-C-X-A-B-C-D-E which is a double
zig-zag followed by a triangle.
2. Chart updated on May 29, 1998
I do not agree with the first A-B-C. The C-wave has been broken up
into a-b-c-x-a-b-c. Elliot must be turning in his grave. The
c-wave of any degree is ALWAYS a 1-2-3-4-5 impulse except when the
c-wave is a leg of a triangle a-b-c-d-e or if the entire c-wave is
itself a diagonal triangle. This man has broken the basic tenets
of the Wave Principle and I would be wasting my time in reading
his counts on the other charts.
|