|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Gee, want the original name Ponzi?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lionel</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Manuel Barquin <<A
href="mailto:ALEMANIA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ALEMANIA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Metastock list <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Monday, September 14, 1998 5:44 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Contact
help<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>There is a company located in Barcelona, Spain, originally
from Chicago who is offering 50% return on the investment (does it sound
familiar?). A</FONT><FONT size=2>pparently this company invests your money
trading in futures and options. The name of the company is Refco, Inc. I
would appreciate if any body has trading references regarding Refco, Inc. (I
can assure you that I am not going to give a penny to this company or to any
other to decide how to trade my money - A friend of mine is considering the
possibility of "giving" his money to Refco, Inc.). Regards, Manuel
Barquin </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Sep 15 10:15:15 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 8661
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 13:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA25078
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 09:43:22 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA25074
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 09:43:19 -0600
Received: from mothra.imaxx.net (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [209.176.72.28])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA04724
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 09:54:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from imaxx.net (sd-0129.imaxx.net [209.176.72.129])
by mothra.imaxx.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA28765
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:47:09 -0500
Message-ID: <35FE8BFF.1E61B238@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:47:11 -0500
From: Wayne Walusiak <waynewal@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: European view/ vs what I saw
References: <014801bde080$affd7120$03c366c3@x>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Dear Patrick ,
> re:George Bush has one longterm mistress and other affairs.
As opposed to hundreds of women alleged to have been 'had' by Mr. Clinton ? I,
for one, don't really care. Most of the European leaders have been alleged to
have had mistresses at one time or another. A different matter to lie about it
under oath. Still another for misconduct within the 'business' area of the
White House. Yet another matter to cover things up once they were being
investigated. I think Mr Nixon was to be impeached for that...until he
resigned.
re:He promised 'Read my lips, no new taxes'. Who would you rather have, a man
who as less than frank about a blow job or a man who lies about taxation?
Of course, the Democrats cooperated to help the President. Seems they demanded
new socialist programs to bargain with Bush on items he wanted....
> re:Reagan lied about Iran Contra and other matters of real importance.
Perhaps, but with a Democrat majority in Congress, they were not able to get
an investigation that turned up anything. So I feel the point is moot, now.
> re:I don't suppose he had blow jobs to lie about but he did dump his first
> wife
> and was a lousy father. I know what I think is more important.
Was that before or after he became president ? If many years before, I hardly
think it matters if he did his job - and he did.
re:The Starr report is an attempt by Republican supporters to annul Clinton's
victories in any way they can. The media collude because they need the story.
What Clinton victories ? The highest tax raises in our history ? Removal of
all attempts to maintain a balanced budget until AFTER the Republican got
majorities in Congress, and FORCED him to balance the budget. I sat in a hotel
room and watched the Democrats repeal the Graham-Rudman(sp.) Act and anything
else that stood in their way of new 'social' programs when they first had the
majority in Congress after Clinton was elected.
Clinton supported Democrat lies of 'the republicanas starving women and
children and trying to take social security away from lod folks'?
> re:Here's a prediction. When the polls start to show a backlash against the
> Republican Party, and they lose control of Congress, watch them distance
> themselves from Starr faster than they backed off from the Contrick with
> America.
Perhaps too many Europeans watch the Clinton News Network (CNN)as an indicator
of what the American people think. Most people here joke about what a laugh
the CNN polls are. Ted Turner & Jane Fonda - owners - are friends of the
Clintons. There hasn't been a negative poll about anything Mr. Clinton has
done since he became president despite any other national polls to the
contrary.Mr. Clinton is now waiting for things to blow over. Nothing will
happen to him for what he did because he's a democrat & a liberal - and looks
and sounds so very good (and sexy to the women) on TV. If Reagan, Bush, or any
other conservative had done 1/10th what Mr. Clinton has done - he'd be dragged
out of the White House by the NOW (Natioanl Organization of 'Women') and
stoned to death.
Sorry if this sounded a bit hot-headed...no personal insult is or was
intended. Those of us who have listed to 6+ years of lies can't wait to see
him leave office.
Thank you,
Wayne Walusiak
|