|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Folks, also try the System File Checker in Win 98. This will this without
the hassle involved in doing it at the DOS prompt. And all DOS prompt work
on changing attributes of system files [if you are hardy enough to undertake
doing this] should be done in DOS, not in a DOS window in Windows.
SFC can be run from the RUN line by typing SFC or SFC.EXE.
You will need to have your CD in the CD drive, or have copied the Win98
folder from the CD onto your hard drive. I recommend against this unless
you have lots of disk space, and in any event you can save about 30 MB by
not including all the AOL, Prodigy, etc files on the Win 98 CD.
Al Stephens
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Sellers
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 1998 10:25 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Death of the Bull?
>
>
> I have had trouble with my registery in the past. May I share the
> method I use
> with you. There is a program called ERU available on the
> Microsoft CD which can
> be used to copy the registery, System.ini, & others to a foppy or
> to your hard
> drive. You may use any of these group BU's in DOS to replace
> present files with
> a ERU command. However this is not a guarantee to bring your
> sysytem to health
> as other troubles may have resulted. In my case I had dll files which were
> contaminated and these can come from many programs. I have found
> some to be
> protected from moving and deletion process. Also usually
> reloading will not
> replace them. I have gone into DOS and used the attribute command
> to remove some
> attributes and then erase them, then you can reload the program
> and fresh files
> will repace them.
> Good luck in the future
>
> Guy Tann wrote:
>
> > Dick
> >
> > Well, wouldn't you know it. Microsoft Office Professional wiped out my
> > registry and I had to reinstall Windows, etc., etc. Therefore,
> when I got
> > the Sell signal for Wed night, I was out of the loop. Looks
> like a great
> > sell, so far.
> >
> > There is still the possibility that we will be provided another
> sell point,
> > but what are the odds. I was out of action, and my brothers
> new P400 was
> > screwed up when his wife, the real estate lady (who makes a
> ton, BTW) sent a
> > tech home to install some real estate package on it. Wiped him out too.
> > We'll have to be real careful not to make modifications to
> software the same
> > week.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Guy
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dick Simmons
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 1998 8:22 PM
> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: Death of the Bull?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Guy,
> > >
> > > You might have an entry point for your shorts here.
> > > S&P back to almost 90 points from the top, 3 waves up, maybe a
> > > lower double
> > > top and there is a strong cycle coming in tomorrow which could
> > > turn it down.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dick.
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Monday, 17 August 1998 6:35
> > > Subject: RE: Death of the Bull?
> > >
> > >
> > > >Al
> > > >
> > > >In looking at your post, and starting my trendline from 10-31-97,
> > > connecting
> > > >it to the bottom of 1-30-98, then we have broken through the
> > > trendline this
> > > >month. Actually, with a chart with an increasing slope, we have had
> > > several
> > > >short term trendlines, IMHO.
> > > >
> > > >Look at the first one beginning at 12-30-94 and extending to
> 7-31-96. A
> > > >second one beginning at 7-31-96 and continuing to 10-31-97.
> Finally, a
> > > >third one beginning 10-31-97 and connecting through 1-30-98.
> It appears
> > > >that we have significantly broken through this last trendline,
> > > if we extend
> > > >it to the right. By my chart, the next resistance and the next
> > > support is
> > > >around 1000, or another 60 points down.
> > > >
> > > >My dad's preliminary estimate for this drop, and these are just rough
> > > >guesstimates, was 21-22% which would take us back to the top of the
> > > parallel
> > > >channel for trendline #1 above.
> > > >
> > > >I guess, we feel there is the possibility that we could continue for
> > > another
> > > >60 point drop and if that doesn't hold, then a further decline to the
> > > >930-940 level. Now, chart wise, this doesn't make a lot of
> sense, but
> > > these
> > > >would be the calculations based upon another methodology we use.
> > > Actually,
> > > >I was hoping for a run up of from 50 to maybe 100 points before
> > > we dropped
> > > >to our 1000 support level, giving me an opportunity to get
> some better
> > > >positions to play with. I would feel better if we had a 50
> point run up
> > > >before we dropped further, otherwise we run the potential of a
> > > major spike
> > > >down like 1987 and going through the bear market in about a
> week's time.
> > > >
> > > >Regards
> > > >
> > > >Guy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > >On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
> > >
> > > >Sent: Saturday, August 15, 1998 1:24 PM
> > > >To: MetaStock List Group
> > > >Subject: Death of the Bull?
> > > >
> > > >In my attempts to develop a methodology for trading the S&P and
> > > as a result
> > > >of looking at different time frames, I offer these observations:
> > > >
> > > >If anyone will look at the S&P on a monthly MS chart from Jan
> > > of 1994, one
> > > >will see a fabulous chart that almost looks like a stairstep.
> > > >
> > > >Since the end of Jan 98 to July 98 there has only been one
> month that the
> > > >S&P traded below the previous months low, and that was only by
> > > 2.31 points
> > > >
> > > >This is the first month that we have traded significantly below the
> > > >previous month.
> > > >
> > > >If a trendline is drawn from the Oct 97 low, we have YET to
> touch that
> > > >line. It is a sign of strength for a trendline to be touched
> > > and therefore
> > > >tested, and we have yet to touch the line.
> > > >
> > > >To all that study channels, I ask, are we not now approaching
> > > the bottom of
> > > >a short term {based on monthly data} channel?
> > > >
> > > >Unless 896.75 on a closing basis is violated, are we not in
> a bull market
> > > >still?
> > > >
> > > >If we do not listen to T V and read newspapers, but trade
> off of charts,
> > > >could we find a more profitable chart pattern?
> > > >
> > > >To all chartist, please give an evaluation.
> > > >
> > > >Al Taglavore
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>
>
|