[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Elliot Waves Reseachers Many Fakes



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><HTML>
<B>Check this out : This guy Larry must have had to put BOTH his feet in
his mouth</B>:
<BR><B>Jan the stock was apparently around 4 bucks today it is available
for 9/16.</B><B></B>

<P><B>For me Prechter would easily qualify in the same category as this
guy Larry Strauss.</B>
<BR><B></B>&nbsp;<B></B>

<P>JANUARY 13, 1998
<BR>&nbsp;
<BR>Brush Creek Recommended a Buy by Elliott Wave
<BR>International Analyst
<BR>&nbsp;
<BR>GRASS VALLEY, CALIFORNIA--Brush Creek Mining and Development Co.,
<BR>Inc. (the Company) is pleased to call attention to an interview in
<BR>the financial press that took place yesterday.&nbsp; The interview
<BR>featured Steven Porter, the Sectors Analyst at Elliott Wave
<BR>International and Larry Strauss, Senior Mining Analyst at
<BR>Cannacord Capital Corporation.
<BR>&nbsp;
<BR>During the course of the interview, Larry Strauss claimed:&nbsp; "The
<BR>longer gold remains depressed, the more powerful the move to the
<BR>upside will likely be.&nbsp; Consider that over half of current gold
<BR>production is uneconomical at today's prices."
<BR>&nbsp;
<BR>In response to the following question:&nbsp; "What is your near term
<BR>industry outlook?&nbsp; Which gold mining stocks are you recommending
<BR>and/or avoiding?"&nbsp; Steven Porter responded:&nbsp; "Canyon Resources,
<BR>Royal Oak, and Brush Creek are enticing plays that I would
<BR>accumulate at current levels.&nbsp; I look at them as core positions
as
<BR>we are well into the crisis stage.&nbsp; The worst of the damage has
<BR>already been seen in these junior stocks.&nbsp; They represent some
<BR>hard value as opposed to the glut of paper assets choking the
<BR>market now."
<BR>&nbsp;</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Aug 09 21:58:40 1998
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (204.246.137.5)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 9200
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA17056
	for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 21:23:59 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: freeze.metastock.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA17038
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 21:23:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from earthlink.net (pool038-max9.mpop3-ca-us.dialup.earthlink.net [207.217.247.188])
	by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA04319;
	Sun, 9 Aug 1998 20:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <35CE6604.564FF9F0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1998 20:16:20 -0700
From: David Gardner <dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BBullish Anyone?
References: <017601bdc3e9$3e6d7900$57525a8f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1

I remember when Prechter was predicting 450 a couple of years ago.  He
only missed it by 8900 points.

David Gardner M.D. Ph.D.
dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
K6LPL