|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Couldn't agree with you more about the new vs. old Equis. New Equis, even with
Metastock only adds bells and whistles with each upgrade while they used to
provide more useful substance for serious traders. Remember macros and
automation? I/ve begun to use other programs more and more. I would certainly
wait for serious review before I bought Metastock RT. Hope it is truely great,
but I sure don't expect anything other than flash and hype.
Good trading.
Al Taglavore wrote:
> Richard, thank you the post. I have had the same thoughts of late. I
> believe the "old" Equis could take the lead, but I am having doubts about
> "Reuters Equis". I believe that Reuters has either changed or suppressed
> the Equis focus.
>
> Al T
>
> ----------
> > From: Richard Estes <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Metastock Realtime version
> > Date: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 2:01 PM
> >
> > Great in its time, but has been surpassed by everyone only worked with
> > Signal. I hope the new WIN-RT version will support all the data feeds or
> > more than one. I am not sure Metastock can catch up.
> >
> > Richard Estes
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gila Brock <brock@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 1:14 PM
> > Subject: Metastock Realtime version
> >
> >
> > >Does anyone have any experience with the Metatstock realtime DOS version
> > >currently available? Would like to hear opinions.
> > >Thanks.
> > >Gila
> > >
> > >
> >
|