[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trendline By Angle Problem



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

From:  http://www.flexsoft.com/

TAS - Technical Analysis Scanner
         
         Technical Analysis Functions
          Chap: 23.1.5       Angle -  Angle of a line                         p.138

          Usage:         ANGLE( a )
          Returns:  Number
          Description :    
          returns the angle in degrees of the line described by the array
          'a'. This function is only usable on an array that has been
          created by either linreg or linreg2.
          Do not confuse the angle returned by this function with the angle
          as viewed on a chart of a security. When you view a chart, your
          charting program most likely has scaled your view so that the
          zero y-axis is not visible. In addition, the angle on a screen
          monitor is distorted by the aspect ratio of your monitor
          (typically 4 wide by 3 high). The angle returned by this function
          is a true mathematical angle which is calculated using the (0,0)
          origin.

          Example:
            X = ANGLE(LINREG(C,-20,0));
            WriteLn(`Angle over last 20 close bars is `,X,' degrees');

          This computes the angle in degrees of the simple linear
          regression line of the closing price over the last 20 days.

Thought the above could be of any help, haven't used it myself though,

Regards,
Ton Maas
Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx

=========================================================
===========================================================
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Scott Roycraft <roycraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Aan: MetastockEmail <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: zaterdag 11 juli 1998 2:57
Onderwerp: Trendline By Angle Problem


>Hello,
>
>Has anyone successfully used Metastock 6.5's Trendline By Angle?  I place it
>on my chart and specify an angle. Then when I compare what I see on the
>screen to what I see on my printed version of the chart. The lines are way
>off! To me it looks like the printed version is accurate.  Does anyone know
>of a work-around?
>
>thanks,
>Scott
>
>