|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
This is an un-moderated list. It is rarely viewed by Equis.
Anytime we don't like something here, we can leave. I can only imagine that
if your ISP has no limit, then it was served by a switching junction that
broke the message up. Why else would it come to me in one post, fully
readable?
At least the post, pulled some lurkers out, maybe they will contribute now.
And if anyone wants to send a chart, go right ahead as far as I am
concerned. I certainly don't follow this list because of the
stocks/individual trades mentioned or discussions on other vendor's
software. I follow it because of my interest in MetaStock 6.5 and how it can
be used. Charts illustrate that best.
I am amazed at the attack on Steve A. for a post seeking help and the blame
being placed on him for something that occurred because of errors outside
his control. This discussion has taken up to much room on that bandwidth
that some want to conserve, so lets discuss MSWIN and how to use it through
indicators/systems/explorations.
Richard Estes
-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Jossart <Alain.Jossart@xxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Estes <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: Affect of zoom amount on simultaneous indicator scales (m.a.
demo.JPG) [7/9]
>Tue, 26 May 1998 17:15:08 -0500, "Richard Estes" <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote :
>
>>Steve had a problem and wanted help. He sent one .JPEG file to illustrate
>>what he was seeing. It seems that some overseas sites and the "free"
>>stateside sites took his 398K post and broke it into parts to cut down
size.
>>Those of us who don't have such a file restriction, received it as one
>>normal file. He got his problem solved, he had not dropped the MA directly
>>on the indicator.
>
>Nope. There is no limitation of e-mail file size by my ISP. Some
>guy just made some tests on the list without event thinking it
>would more appropriate to tune by loopback testing first.
>
>Next. I'm seriously questioning the abusive use of binary files that's
>developing on this E-MAIL list. IMHO binary attachments should limited
>to under 30 Kb. Other lists have demonstrated that it was perfectly
>feasible to transfer stock charts and respect this decent file size.
>
>What's the list manager position about that (Equis ?)
>
>Alain
|