|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> To all list members:
>
> Apparently the MetastokList mail address from which we
> post to the list has a problem. I am therefore forwarding this
> message from our direct support address to make sure it is posted.
>
> I originally posted this on Wednesday, October 1, 1997:
>
> I am posting this message because Mr. Feyder thinks we
> blocked its distribution when he originally posted it, As I have said
> before, we do not censor messages before they are posted. Here it is
> uncensored as the list server received it. If you received it
> previously, I apologize for you receiving it again.
>
> Today is Monday, October 6, 1997:
>
> We have been experiencing some strange mail problems so
> I am sending this again as it appears it did not get posted last week.
> Again, I apologize if you have already received this.
>
> Equis Support
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L Feyder [SMTP:LFEYDER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 1997 10:19 AM
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Reality Online Data (missprint
> corrected)
>
> In April I subscribed to Reality Online data on
> futures. I reported that
> Currencies go back to 1992,
> SP-500 -to1993,
> missing days were everywhere ...Eventually I got an
> indication that within
> 2 months database would be cleaned. So in August I
> subscribed again.
> Nothing has changed.
> Among other things I reported are following :
> a ) what reported as Globex session is not Globex
> (same with night
> session at CBOT)
> b) Comex Gold has many clusters of bad
> data(Hi=Low,Volume=0)
> c) Estimated Open Interest and Volume for current
> day are not
> provided(=0)
> d) many suspiciously large moves
> e) on 8/22/97 US-T-Bond opening was off by 15
> ticks(reported same day)
> f) large portion of contracts being constantly
> corrected 1-5 days
> back.
> I spoke to everybody I could at Reality Online, Equis,
> and Reuters.
> Management at Reality Online replied it is out of their
> hands.
> Ms Peterson (Reuters) was surprised that data is not
> perfect and promised
> to get back to me (I am still waiting)
> Ms Zajack (public relation ,Reuters ) replied ,that at
> Reality Online many
> people, including President spoke to me and they are
> trying to HELP ME, at
> legal department (Reuters) somebody is writing me a
> letter (still
> waiting),what else do I want?
> Mr. Kearney (Reuters) promised some reply from Reuters
> within 2 days (3
> days passed),
> but somehow was concerned (?) if I am an Institutional
> investor, and what
> Co. I am with.
> At Reality Online replies from Supervisor and
> Manager of Technical
> Support are following:
> 1) There is backlog (even in (e)?)
> 2)They already reported everything to QA department
> 3)To my request to send me the log of errors reported
> by me - they do
> not see how it could be of any use to me , nor do they
> have Director's
> permission.
> I am looking forward comparing what is advertised as
> Highest Quality data
> from Reuters against Reuters-Terminal data.
> There is a penalty of $100 for divulging membership ID
> (Reality Online
> rights are being protected)
> I would like to here what you think. And if it is of
> interest I'll have
> more to say soon.
> Sincerely, Leon Feyder.
>
>
|