|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Mike:
You are correct about the 1st filter. On a sample of 160 miscellaneous
stocks, all were rejected.
With the 2nd filter, on a sample of 250 stocks, 75% were rejected. I need
to examine these results to see where the better finds can be identified.
I looked at 4 stocks with high colA (stochastic) and 4 with low colA, there
did not seem to be much correlation between the chart pattern and the value
of the stochastic. NOTE: this is a very small sample. Most of these 8
stocks were in an uprend.
I would say that the 2nd filter is more useful.
Lionel
At 08:32 PM 9/18/97 -0400, michael.arnoldi@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>col a: Stoch(5,3)
>col b: Ref(Stoch(5,3), -1)
>col c: MACD()
>col d: Mov(MACD(),9,E)
>col e: Ref(MACD(), -2)
>col f: Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2)
>filter: enabled = YES
>
> When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E))AND
> When(C,>,Mov(C,200,S)) AND
> When(colA,<,80)AND When(colA,>,colB)AND
> When(colC,<,1)AND When(colC,>,colD)AND
> When(colE,<,colF)AND When(colE,<,0)AND
> When(Ref(MACD(),-10),<,colC
>
> newly posted:
>
>When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E)) AND When(Stoch(5,3),<,80)
>AND When(Stoch(5,3),>,Ref(Stoch(5,3),-1)
>AND When(MACD(),<,1)
>AND When(MACD(),>,Mov(MACD(),9,E)
>AND When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2)
>AND When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,0)
>AND When(Ref(MACD(),-10),>,MACD()))))
>
>after this recent posting, i find that the BRADY BREAKOUT system looks
>different from a previous one posted.
>
>which is the better one ??
>
>i find that the first one hardly ever generates a list.
>
>mike
>
>
>
|